The State Bank of the Russian Empire in Moscow. This building now houses the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION took place at a time of
remarkable financial stability and progress in the Russian Empire.
Russia was the only major power in the world not indebted to central
bankers concentrated around the famous Rothschild banks. The Russian
government printed the nation’s money, regulated the money supply
(unlike the monetary system in America today) and issued low interest
loans through commercial banks.
Festival in a Siberian village, c. 1900
In his book, “A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of
Mankind,” (Black House Publishing, 2014) Stephen Mitford Goodson
describes the state of Russia before the Bolshevik uprising:
On June 12, 1860 The State Bank of the
Russian Empire was founded with the aim of boosting trade turnovers and
the strengthening of the monetary system. Up to 1894 it was an auxiliary
institution under the direct control of the Ministry of Finance. In
that year it was transformed into being the banker of the bankers and
operated as an instrument of government’s policy. It minted and printed
the nation’s coins and notes, regulated the money supply and through
commercial banks provided industry and commerce with low interest rate
loans. Its vast gold reserves, the largest in the world, exceeded the
bank note issue by more than 100%, except for the year 1906. By 1914 it
had become one of the most influential lending institutions in Europe.
Not unexpectedly Russia had the smallest
national debt in the world. The following table reflects the number of
rubles of debt per inhabitant.
By 1914 83% of the interest and
amortization of the national debt, of which less than 2% was held
abroad, was funded by the profits of the Russian State Railways. In 1916
the total length of the main lines was 100,817 verst or kilometers.
Russian commercial and canal tonnage of 11,130,000 in 1910 exceeded
British merchant tonnage of 10,750,000.
In 1861 Tsar Alexander II (1855-81)
abolished serfdom, which at that time affected 30% of the population. By
1914 very little land remained in the possession of the Russian estate
owners, who were mainly the nobility. 80% of the arable land was in the
hands of the peasants, which had been ceded to them for a very small
sum. This land was held in trust by the village commune or mir. However,
after the passing of the Stolypin Act in 1906, peasants could obtain
individual title with hereditary rights. By 1913, two million families
had availed themselves of this opportunity to ac1uire what became known
as “Stolypin farms.” Nearly 19,000,000 acres (7,689,027 hectares) were
alloted to these individual peasant proprietors by the land committees.
The Peasants’ State Bank, which was described at that time as the
“greatest and most socially beneficent institution of land credit in the
world” granted loans at a low rate of interest, which was in effect a
handling charge. Between 1901 and 1912 these loans increased from 222
million rubles to 1,168 billion rubles.
Agricultural production soared so that by
1913, Russia had become the world’s bread basket as the following table
reveals. [Not included. The table shows that Russia produced 42 percent
of the world’s barley, 67 percent of its rye, 31 percent of its wheat
and 30 percent of its oats].
Russian agricultural production of
cereals exceeded the combined production of Argentina, Canada and the
United States by 25%. In 1913 Russia had 37.5 million horses – more than
half of all those in the world. She also produced 80% of the world’s
flax and provided more than 50% of the world’s egg imports. Mining and
industrial output also expanded by huge margins. Between 1885 and 1913
coal production increased from 259.6 million poods (16.38 kg) to 2,159.8
million poods, cast iron production rose from 25 million poods in 1890
to 1,378 million poods in 1913 and petroleum production rose from 491.2
million poods in 1906 to 602.1 million poods in 1916. From 1870 to 1914
industrial output grew by 1% per annum in Great Britain, 2.75% per annum
in the United States and 3.5% per annum in Russia. During the period
from 1890 to 1913 industrial production quadrupled and Russian
industries were able to satisfy 80% of internal demand for manufactured
goods – a perfect example of autarky. Throughout the last 20 years of
peacetime imperial rule (1895-1914) the increase in Gross Domestic
Product averaged 10% per annum.
With the Russian State bank creating the
people’s money out of nothing at almost zero interest; as opposed to the
rest of the world where central banks allowed parasitic private banks
to create their nation’s money supply at usurious rates of interest, it
comes as no surprise to find that in 1912 Russia had the lowest levels
of taxation in the world. These very low rates of taxation also attest
to the efficiency of the Russian government. Furthermore throughout this
period of state banking there was no inflation and no unemployment.
[Table not include. Total tax rate in
Great Britain was 26.75 percent per inhabitant, compared to 2.66 percent
per inhabitant Russia.]
An independent study by British lawyers
concluded that the Russian Code of Laws and judiciary were “the most
advanced and impartial in the world.”
Elementary education was obligatory and
free right up to university level, where only nominal fees were charged.
Between 1906 and 1914 10,000 schools were opened annually. Russian
universities were renowned for their high academic standards.
In labor relations the Russians were
pioneers. Child labor was abolished over 100 years before it was
abolished in Great Britain in 1867. Russia was the first industrialized
country to pass laws limiting the hours of work in factories and mines.
Strikes, which were forbidden in the Soviet Union, were permitted and
minimal in Tsarist times. Trade union rights were recognized in 1906,
while an Inspectorate of Labor strictly controlled working conditions in
factories. In 1912 social insurance was introduced. Labor laws were so
advanced and humane that President William Taft of the United States was
moved to say that “the Emperor of Russia has passed workers’
legislation which was nearer to perfection than that of any democratic
country.”
The people of all races in the Russian
empire had an equality of status and opportunity, which was unparalleled
in the modern world. His Imperial majesty Tsar Nicholas II (1894-1917)
and his state bank had created a workers’ paradise that was unrivaled in
the history of mankind.
On November 7, 1917, the Rothschilds,
fearful that replication of this extraordinary example of freedom and
prosperity would destroy their malevolent banking empire, instigated and
financed a Judeo-Bolshevik revolution in Russia (50), which wrecked and
ruined a wonderful country and resulted in the deaths by murder and
starvation, according to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, of 66 million innocent
people. (51)
[A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind, Stephen Mitford Goodson, Black House Publishing, London, 2014; pp. 77-83]
My favorite
Southron Paleface called me a pineapple a couple of posts ago that elicited a hearty Laugh Out Loud In teh Real Life from me.
He followed up the with this: "...see, racists can make racist nicknames
against each other. in the good ol' days that meant camaraderie!"
Commenter Victor Michaelson weighed in as well: "It reminded me of the
America I grew up in, where guys could razz their buddies and it wasn't a
Federal offense."
Damn straight you raciss crackers!
We got a special word for you melanin-deficient and solar-sensitive folks here in Hawaii: Haole (pronounced "How-Lee").
From the greatest movie ever filmed in Hawaii
Most folks that have never been to Hawaii, or who have only visited
briefly on vacation, have usually only heard of the word haole
associated with only negative, racist connotations...the equivalent of
the "N-word" for white folks.
That's simply not true. It's a very versatile word and can be used as a
simple adjective, a term of endearment or employed as a provocative
epithet. As a fair-complexioned (but not totally pale) hapa-haole mutt,
I've had the term used on myself in all of these contexts at one time or
another. Yet, whenever haole folks come to Hawaii and find themselves
being referred by that term, they almost always take immediate offense.
Take this guy for instance:
More haole den haole...
Shua ting, brah, you one human...but you still one haole.
But seriously, let's take a closer look at where this term came from.
It's a common myth that the term comes from the Hawaiians who first
encountered Captain Cook and his crew's pale faces, they called them
Ha'ole, a compound word made from combining Ha- meaning breath, with 'ole meaning without.
This legend is up for debate, as the linguists who study Hawaiian
language and the Pidgin English have belabored to dispel the commonly
accepted origin. To the credentialed classes, haole is it's own Hawaiian word, and it simply means foreigner:
So if we are to literally go by the textbook, haole really
doesn't have anything to do with white skin. In theory, yes, but in
practice, no. Thanks to the deluge of immigration from all corners of
the globe mixing and miscegenating for a couple of centuries, Hawaii is
the so-called ideal "melting pot" our modern day SJW's and progressives
say they are supposedly working towards with the rest of the world. In
such a chaotic environment of so many different skin tones, hair and eye
colors, race is the first way we immediately identify each other, and
in that context, haole means white.
I do believe Hawaii is the ideal "melting pot" society....but there are
two distinct features about what we have here that makes it much
different from the progressive/SJW ideal.
First thing that makes it "work" is we are all race realists, race
conscious and racist to the core. It's the only way we can all get
along. We don't try to uphold some unrealistic, mystical feeling of
holiness attributed to the supposedly ideal paradigm of "color
blindness." In fact, we have the exact opposite. We're more color aware,
we're all equal opportunity racists. We LOVE our stereotypes and our
racist jokes. At least that was the Hawaii I grew up in. Because of
this, we all have similar words like haole that are used to designate
all the various races that call our islands home. We got similar words
for the Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Samoans, Micronesians, Filipinos,
Puerto Ricans, Vietnamese, and Hispanics. Most of these terms are just
like haole - they can serve as simple adjectives or spitefully intended
perjoratives. In most cases, you just add the word fuckin' in front, and
the harmless adjective turns into hateful, bigoted and racist
invective.
Here's a song from the 70's from Hawaiian music's most popular act of
that era, the Beamer Brothers. with one of their most popular songs that
is still sung and played by musicians at parties and backyard jams
everywhere in the islands to this day. In this song, all of the major
ethnic groups and their sterotypes regarding their cultural practices
and socio-economic status are fair game for good natured-ribbing:
The ending of the song really highlights the main point of this post here:
One thing I when notice 'bout this place
All us guys we tease the other race
It's amazing that we can all live in the same place
I sadly see more and more of the next generation of local folks
accepting the progressive SJW mind rot programming of "equality" and
"anti-racism," and our common culture is suffering for it. For decades,
local stand up comedians made entire careers out of night club routines
and television specials making fun of all the races that made up the
multi-ethnic society of 20th century Hawaii. There were no sacred cows.
We were all fair game...and it had us all laughing our asses off. Yeah,
we may have been laughing at you...but then one minute later, it was my
turn and you were now laughing at me too. And thus, we were all both
laughing at and with each other.
This locally produced tell-a-vision show from 1984 could be considered a
good representation of the high point of Hawaii's functionally racist
society. It was a childhood favorite of mine, and I was pleasantly
surprised to find a clip of it posted on youtube.
In case you didn't figure it out yet, while black folks are "foreigners" they are not haole. We call them Popolos.
Hawaiian island/urban legend goes that the first African descendants
who came to our shores where of the particular hue that was so dark, the
Hawaiians thought they looked purple. The Hawaiian word for purple is popolu...hence
popolo. I don't know if it's true or not, but I do know this: just like
the word haole, popolo can be used interchangably as mere adjective, a
term of endearment, or a race-based slur.
Speaking of stereotypes, we local folk also understand that most popolos
that recently arrive from the mainland for are far more sensitive about
race than any other race. We have met more than a few black folks that
quickly figured outpopolo was the Hawaiian word for those of
African ancestry, and many immediately equate it with the N-word in
significance. Not true though. If we are trying to be deliberately
offensive, we'll use the N-word like any other garden variety racist in
the world today.
Nevertheless, if we local folks are trying to talk about black people
and there may be some within hearing distance when we are conversing who
may possibly get offended, we may sometimes say Olopop instead of
Popolo (popolo said backwards).
As I mentioned earlier, I was pleasantly surprised to find the preceding
clip on youtube, because it is not commercially available anywhere here
in 2015. This clip was undoubtedly someone using their smartphone to
video clip their VHS or betamax copy of the program. You see, in the
last decade or so, our formerly somewhat cooperative society of equal
opportunity racism has been infected with the PC mind virus, and the
SJW's holy church of blessed colorblindness has caused many folks to
scream victimhood at racial humor that was one of our mainstays of local
Hawaiian culture of the 20th century. So many of these race-based shows
and stand up comedy routines are no longer available or reproduced or
re-released anymore, out of fear someone or another will get offended
and file a lawsuit to recover damages for their soiled panties or sand
filled ass cracks.
That being said, one of the original local comedians from that earlier
era of racist harmony still seems to be going at it on youtube, and this
clip will give you a pretty good rundown on our history of ethnic
diversity and multi-cultural adaptation with regards to linguistics and
cultural attitudes of our multi-cult society:
This comedian, Andy Bumatai, was one of the most popular stand up
comedians and local tell-a-vision personalities of the 80's. In 2015,
this kind of comedy is increasingly coming under fire. Note his
disclaimer at the beginning of the clip. Even 5-10 years ago, such a
disclaimer would not have been necessary. Times they are a changin'.
More and more of the younger generations of Hawaii's locals have been
assimilated into the PC-SJW Borg by globalized mass media programming
and public education brainwashing.
No siree, it's the 21st century, and we can no longer hurt anyone's FEEEEEEEELLLLLIIINNGS.
Everybody is so fuckin' sensitive. It sucks. I want my openly racist
society back. More and more we see letters to the editors and magazine
articles and tell-a-vision programs pushing the "colorblind" paradigm
and that all of the racist stereotypes that bonded us all together in
common racism in 20th century Hawaii, are now being considered more and
more to be thoughtcrime and badthink that must be expunged from our
consciousness. It makes me sick to see Hawaii's uniquely harmonious and
cooperative society founded on a solid sense of racial differences,
slowly and inexorably being subsumed by the homogenized and globalized
Brave New World Order mass media culture programming of hypersensitivity
and ludicrous "equality."
Up until recently, we didn't have a pretend, fake ideal that everyone
supposedly openly touts while harboring secret racism in their carefully
guarded hearts and circumspect tongues. No siree, here in our island
paradise, we embraced bigotry and race-based differences whole-heartedly
and without reservation.
Our code word for it nowadays is "local humor" I've been to parties
where people asked if it were okay to tell "local jokes," basically
asking permission from all present if it's okay to tell race-based
stereotypical jokes. Most are still down with the program...but more and
more people are starting to reject what was once a proudly and openly
racist society...and from where I sit, we 'aint better off for it.
See...one of the reasons our society of mixed races "works" is because
no matter what race you are or what culture you come from, we have this
overriding culture of "ALOHA SPIRIT" that most people quickly
assimilate to. In many ways, it's similar to how all the different pale
face crackers assimilated into the AMERICAN DREAM in the 19th century.
Anglo-Germanic-Iberian-Mediterranean-Slavic-Aryan-Nordic migrations all
arrived with different cultures and languages, with the only thing in
common being melanin-deficient and solar-sensitive skin. But buying into
the American dream eventually gave us what many now consider simply as
white Americans (or Canadians).
Just as the miscegenation of all those Euro-strains of paleface resulted
in a generic, homogenized race called "white" we have the same thing
here in Hawaii....but it 'aint called Hawaiian. Only those of us with
actual Half-Savage Aboriginal blood in our veins can be called Hawaiian.
Those who are born and raised here, but have no Hawaiian blood, and are
for the most part the Oriental descendents of the plantation workers
imported by the haole sugar barons as third world serfs, they are
something else - "local."
Here are some examples of this common culture of "Aloha spirit" that define "local" off the top of my head:
* We get rush hour traffic as bad as anywhere else in our modern world.
But nobody honks their horns here...ever. Unless it's due to an extreme
situation like an imminent accident or trying to catch someones
attention in a dire situation, we just don't use our car horns like
that. If you find yourself in Hawaiian rush hour traffic and you hear
someone honking their horn in frustration... well there's the fuckin'
haole (regardless of the race of the actual driver.)
* When you try to merge into traffic, put on your traffic signal and in a
manner of moments, someone will let you in, guaranteed. A couple of
fuckin' haole's may blast past you and not let you in, but eventually a
local is going to slow down and hand wave you in. We even let haole's
merge, but then curse them when they don't show appreciation for the
courtesy.
* Speaking of traffic in Hawaii, here's one of our more popular bumper stickers:
* Other than traffic customs, we have a generalized culture of common courtesy like holding the doors open
for complete strangers, and before the ubiquity of cell phones, we
always stopped to help fellow motorists with broke down cars and flat
tires.
* When we eat in self service restaurants, fast food joints and plate
lunch places, we clean up our tables and throw away all of our rubbish.
The first time I went to the US Mainland at age 18, one of the first big
culture shocks I experienced was seeing fast food patrons leave their
trays and rubbish at their tables when they were done eating for the
workers to clean up.
These are just a few examples of what I'm trying to get at. The "melting
pot" ideal can only work when their is a common ideal that various
racial stocks strive to assimilate to.
As the comedian stated in the preceding clip, there are two kinds of
haole, local haole and haole. I believe it actually goes further than
that. In terms of use as a harmless adjective, haole just means white
skin. No more, no less.
As a perjorative, however, it really means a white skinned person who
doesn't conform to local norms aka "No more aloha." Most of us mixed
race mutts and half savage racists of Hawaii got no problem with local
haoles...or even haoles who are not born and raised, but demonstrate an
affinity for the Aloha spirit ethos. Many a local who 'hates' haoles in
general, end up marrying one and making hapa-haole babies. Despite
having a paleface spouse and paleface children, will still "hate" haoles
(the NO ALOHA kine.)
For real kine...some of my best friends are Japs, Pakes, Soles, Kanaks,
Pordagees, Buk Buks, Yobos, Haoles and Popolos. I also know folks of all
said races who I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire.
I once got
into a scrap with a filipino kid in middle school, because he called me a
fuckin' haole. I told him to fuck off, I'm Hawaiian, and that he was a dumb flip
buk buk whose parents came here to pick pineapple for $.05 a day and
that he should take his ass back to the Philipines. We
punched each other in the face a few times, the teachers broke us up,
and we later became friends when we had to serve detention together. He
would often greet me as "haole boy" and
I'd call him buk buk, and we'd laugh as we shook hands.
It's pretty much how we roll here in Hawaii.
In summation, racial awareness plays an important role in Hawaiian
society, but it's not the be all end all. If you "get" what Aloha means,
you can fit and find a comfortable space amongst others, regardless of
your race.
To wrap things up, I offer you this quick guide for HBD-Hawaiian Style.
Since most of the previous section of this post discussed the term
Haole, Whites are omitted here to avoid excessive redundancy. We talked
enough about da haoles.
Blacks: Popolo, Olopops. Most popolos come to
Hawaii as stationed military personnel. Most usually don't get it any
better or worse than any other minority in Hawaii. If they get involved
in an aggressive or violent conflict, the N-word may get used on them,
but popolo is usually preferred. There are no real popolo jokes unique
to Hawaii, as most are just popular black jokes that just substitute the
word popolo for the N-word.
What do you call 1000 popolo skydivers jumping out of da airplanes all at da same time? Nightfall.
Chinese: Pake ('Pah-kay'), Chink, slant-eye, slope, Cha Wan
(chinese name for the rice bowl haircut), Chang. Terms When used
perjoratively, Pake and Chang denote stinginess, miserliness, an
unhealthy love of money and unscrupulous in acquiring it. Most Jewish
jokes will work in Hawaii by substituting Pake. Wot da difference between one Pake and one canoe? Canoes sometimes tip.
How do da Pakes name their children? They copy da sounds of da cash register! Ching! Chang! Chong! Whats da odda way dey name da kids? Dey throw silvah weah down da stairs!
Filipinos: Flip, Buk Buk ('Book-Book'), Manong (Mah-nong).
Notorious for eating goat and dog meat (particularly black dog), avid
gamblers and chicken fighters. Also notorious for living with 30
extended family members in a 3 bedroom townhome...or buying a 3 bedroom
house and building large extensions that resemble Spanish villas, so
they can house 30 more family members.
You heard of da new Filipino cookbook? 101 ways for wok your dog. What do da Buk Buk's call da dog catcha truck? Meals on Wheels
What do Buk Buk's call da Humane Society? (local animal shelter) Foodland! (local grocery store chain)
Japanese: Japanee, Jap, Buddha-head, rice-eye, bolo head, nip.
Haole-fied Japanese are called katonk or banana (yellow on the
outside, white on the inside). The largest homogeneous ethnicity block
in Hawaii. Least likely race to date, marry or even socialize
significantly with all the other races. Back in da school days, if you
wanted to start a scrap with a jap, you said this:
What you said, Buddha-head? Eh, no lie, rice eye! Jews:Haole. Since most Jews are fair skinned,
we don't give them their own racial category. They're just haole. And
we don't really tell Jewish jokes here either. That's what Pake jokes
are for. But that does remind me of the one Jewish joke I once heard at a
party...told by a hapa-haole Jew (he was half Jewish, half Popolo, born
and raised here):
Know how copper wire got invented? A Jew and a Pake were fighting over a penny.
Koreans: Yobo, Kim Chee, Kink (Korean chink), Seoul
Brother (A Korean that acts black). Because Koreans were relatively
late comers in terms of immigration compared to the other Oriental
ethnicities, Korean jokes are not that popular, but there are a few.
Yobo is the Korean word for sweetheart, but in Hawaii, it's used as a
derogatory reference. Most korean jokes are puns off of the word.
Heard of da Korean police man? Yobocop!
Samoans: Sole (So-lay). Due to their reputations as very large,
strong and fierce fighters who are ready to scrap at the drop of a hat,
there are no real derogatory terms for Samoans. Sole is what Samoans
call themselves, and locals usually can use the term casually....but
even using that word wrong with an easy to anger Samoan could prove
volatile. Most Sole fall into two categories: 1) super nice, easy going,
humorous, fun loving and gregarious. 2) Ultra violent, looking for
trouble, very easy to anger and always ready to give Palagi and others a
sase (strike)! Nevertheless, there are a large number of Samoan jokes
that mostly focus on making fun of their speech. These jokes are usually
only told in hushed whispers after checking around to make sure none
are around to hear....
Heard of da Samoan Accoutant? Tua Tua Isa Foa!
Heard of da Samoan who fell off da couch? Sole Fe Lafa Sofa!
Portuguese: Portagee, Pordagee, Pocho, Porcho. Haoles often think
they get the worst of the prejudice jokes in Hawaii. They're wrong.
That would be the Pordagees. Infamous for being obnoxious by talking way
too much, talking without thinking first, and considered the dimmest,
least intelligent race. Take any Polak joke and substitute Pordagee and
you have typical Hawaii pordagee jokes. Despite the joking reputation,
Pordagees are usually quite sharp and witty, and many of the most
popular comedians are proud Pordagees who tell the best-loved Pordagee
jokes.
You heard why get no more ice in Portugal? Da old Pordagee lady with da recipe when die. Know why da Pordagee farmer was feeding his sheep scrap metal? He was trying for raise steel wool.
As I said, their reputation is one of dim wits....but here's a Pordagee joke that belies the stereotype:
Know why Pordagee Jokes are so short? So Hawaiians can understand them.
A Pordagee guy told that one to me after I told him a Pordagee joke. Touche!
Hawaiians: Kanaka, Kanaks, Kanaka Maoli. Oft stereotype is
lazy, indolent; don't like to work. When the haole sugar plantation
owners needed a workforce to farm their sugar, there were not enough
Hawaiians to work because so many had died from introduced diseases like
small pox, measles and STDs. And those that did survive, would still
only work 'Hawaiian style." We can broke ass, but we goin' take one mid
day break when da sun is hottest in da sky. The haole plantation owners
didn't like that one bit, so they brought in all the other immigrants
who would work from sun up to sun down with barely a break for minimal
wages.
Take any lazy jokes about blacks and substitute Hawaiian.
How come da Pakes no like marry Hawaiians? Dey no like kids too lazy for pick sugar cane. How come da Buk Buks no like marry Hawaiians? Dey no like kids too lazy for pick pineapple. How come da Popolos no like marry Hawaiians? Dey no like kids too lazy for steal.
'Aint diversity grand?
Update:
Remember: "Nobody Listens to Turtle".
And Conan's view of the races/race relations:
"There is no racial bigotry here. I do not look down on niggers, kikes, wops or greasers. Here you are all equally worthless."
Dr. Alfred Kinsey was an American zoologist and later
sexologist who founded The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender,
and Reproduction. His research on human sexuality sparked controversy
in the ’40s and ’50s…
As the debate over sex education was heating up in Croatia, a country
where 86% of the population identifies as Catholic, Mrs. Kristo found
herself watching The Kinsey Syndrome and Kinsey’s Pedophiles,
documentaries exposing the horrors of Kinsey’s research. These horrors
include Kinsey paying pedophiles to rape children and time it with a
stopwatch. “As I watched the production, I felt sick and disgusted. I
felt awful. I thought: people don’t know what has happened. They need to
know!…”
According to Kinsey’s books, his published research, and the
statements of his assistants in various interviews, not only was
Kinsey’s research flawed, but it was also criminal. Child sexuality
research data was collected from the personal logs of several pedophiles
– one in particular kept detailed diaries of over 800 sexual encounters
with children, and even with babies as young as two months old. Kinsey
also collected data and financially compensated fathers who were
sexually abusing their own children. He even collaborated with infamous
Nazi pedophile Dr. Fritz von Balluseck, who diarized his sexual abuse of
hundreds of pre-adolescent girls and boys. At the trial of von
Balluseck, the judge criticized Kinsey for not having reported these
crimes to police…
As a result of his questionable “research,” Kinsey made unbelievable
statistical claims, including the following: 10-36% of men are
homosexual; homosexuality, incest, rape, pedophilia, and even bestiality
are normal, and 95% of men engage in these behaviors; 40% of married
women are having affairs; 25% of married women are having abortions.
This abortion statistic is said to have been the catalyst in convincing
lawmakers to legalize abortion.
In the film Kinsey’s Pedophiles, Dr. Paul Gebhard, Kinsey co-author,
states on camera that the Kinsey team solicited child abusers and
obtained child “sexuality” data from pedophiles as well as a pedophile
organization. Off camera, as part of the court reporter’s transcription,
Paul Gebhard states that this organization was the predecessor to
NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association)…
In her book Kinsey: Crimes and Consequence, Dr. Reisman explains how
since the ’60s The Kinsey Institute was determined to incorporate
Kinsey’s philosophy into sex education material for children. They
partnered with Planned Parenthood to achieve this objective. Dr. Reisman
exposes how it was Kinsey’s research that claimed that children are
sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth and are unharmed by incest
and adult-child sex and often benefit from such activity.
Kids having sex is normal, mating with anything up to and including
animals is normal, as is women having affairs behind their husbands’
backs, if you have an r-selected reproductive strategy. So to them, none
of this is wrong, nor should you question any research which proves it
right. Rabbits never even think about it.
I increasingly find myself wondering if conscious logical thought is
something a select few are trained to do when they find themselves
confronting a world which they (and their reproductive
strategy/psychology) are not designed for.
Libertarians end up very thoughtful because after umpteen times
confronting the fact that they can’t just enjoy life and be left alone,
they begin to knuckle down and look closely at how they are living, and
whether something they are doing is right or wrong. I imagine if every
libertarian lived in the wilderness of Alaska, treated those they
happened across politely right up until they had to kill them, and then
they continued on, making their way as they prepared for the winter, few
libertarians would think critically about life. They’d go day by day,
each emotion perfectly guiding them to optimal behavior, be it surviving
and enjoying calm moments, or occasionally burying the bodies of those
whose unctuousness brought it upon themselves. They would die without
ever understanding liberalism, conservatism, or questioning what is
right or wrong. They would just know how to live.
Conservatives, confronted with rabbit insanity everywhere they look
in a degraded society, end up having to sit down and say, what the hell
is wrong with all this? But did they worry about it in highly K-ified
times, or did they just ignore it, and enjoy working as part of a
cohesive group to make cool stuff, ejecting non-conformists and
degenerates, winning battles, and enjoying time with family on the
weekends?
Today, rabbits might not be thinking, because in these times of r,
rabbitism works. I’m guessing that with a few hundred million, and tons
of porn stars, Charlie Sheen isn’t exactly a modern day Socrates. I
imagine when the apocalypse hits, and running from the harshness only
means you’ll die tired, we can expect rabbits to begin to be more
thoughtful, and hopefully realize that rabbitism is the epitome of evil.
Either that, or they will all get killed. Either way will work for me at this point.
Apocalypse cometh™
In Cuckservative, John Red
Eagle and I conclusively demonstrated, using official government
statistics, that immigrant labor is a net negative to Americans and
American workers. Others who are looking into the subject are reliably
finding that the importation of foreign labor is harmful:
Last year, thousands of American companies won permission to bring a
total of more than 150,000 people into the country as legal guest
workers for unskilled jobs, under a federal program that grants them
temporary work permits known as H-2 visas. Officially, the guest workers
were invited here to fill positions no Americans want: The program is
not supposed to deprive any American of a job, and before a company wins
approval for a single H-2 visa, it must attest that it has already made
every effort to hire domestically. Many companies abide by the law and
make good-faith efforts to employ Americans.
Yet a BuzzFeed News investigation, based on Labor Department records,
court filings, more than 100 interviews, inspector general reports, and
analyses of state and federal data, has found that many businesses go to
extraordinary lengths to skirt the law, deliberately denying jobs to
American workers so they can hire foreign workers on H-2 visas
instead....
At the same time, companies across the country in a variety of
industries have made it all but impossible for U.S. workers to learn
about job openings that they are supposed to be given first crack at.
When workers do find out, they are discouraged from applying. And if,
against all odds, Americans actually get hired, they often are treated
worse and paid less than foreign workers doing the same job, in order to
drive the Americans to quit.
What’s more, companies often do this with the complicity of government
officials, records show. State and federal authorities have allowed
companies to violate the spirit — and often the letter — of the law with
bogus recruitment efforts that are clearly designed to keep Americans
off the payroll. And when regulators are alerted to potential problems,
the response is often ineffectual.
I know it's painful for the devotees of free trade, who love nothing
better than to compare 21st century analyses to 18th century dogma, to
admit, but the increasingly undeniable empirical reality is that free
trade, and the free movement of labor, are about as Marxist, globalist,
socially destructive, and economically harmful as Communism.
I've read every single defense of free trade that I can find. None of
them, not a single one of them, holds up. And as for those who babble
childishly about a protectionist government picking winners, as if that
suffices to make a rational case, what on Earth do they think is
happening in the USA and in the EU now?
All that free trade accomplishes is that it allows governments to pick
winners from around the world rather than from inside their own borders.
And the winners are those who are willing to pay the most for the
privilege, which is why the dominant figures in the U.S. media are a) an
Australian and b) a Lebanese based in Mexico.
Update 1 - dc. sunsets comments on the original post:
I used to be a free trader. I now see that virtually any "good" will be inverted if not embedded in a larger cohesive social milieu.
Shared identity (culture, heritage, etc.) is a powerful system of disciplining naked self-interest. Cultural Marxism's and Blank Slate's first effect is to destroy shared identity, freeing people to undertake individually profitable actions that utterly destroy the commons on which their lives depend.
Multi-culturalism and totalitarian anti-racism/anti-sexism produce, in fact, a monstrous Tragedy of the Commons, where a common culture, common heritage, even common belief systems and common values are the essential connective tissue of a peaceful and prosperous society.
Maybe it makes me an aspie, but the inescapable conclusion from this
logic train is that what "we" need more than anything is separatism.
My
family and I will thrive best if we live our lives embedded in a
homogeneous society, one where we share the same core values. Given the
axioms of HBD, this means we would best live in a society of straight,
culturally conservative (at least nominally Christian) people primarily
of Northern European descent, and where all others would be encouraged to Go. Somewhere. Else.
Such a cohesive community would embed powerful checks and balances on
members' individual actions, most of them subtle and private rather than
public and legalistic. Borders would be semi-permeable to goods, virtually impermeable to people.
As
Hans Hermann Hoppe has noted, Job #1 would be ejecting anyone who tried
to infect the Body Politic with the poisons with which it is saturated
today.
@17
Leo, sadly I'm compelled to see that while permeability to people is
THE most disastrous of free trade, there must certainly be instances
where The Commons of a cohesive society is threatened by certain goods
as well.
My lingering libertarian quickly asks, "Who is to decide
what is socially good and what is not?" but when caught in the vise
between "Authority Decides" and "Naked Self-Interest Rules," I'm now
forced to side with Authority.
Until humans self-segregate and
geographically separate into relatively homogeneous societies there will
be too little social cohesion to subtly apply moral opprobrium in
enough quantity to offset naked self-interest. A relatively free society cannot emerge from or even survive amidst heterogeneity, this should now be blatantly obvious.
Until
then, the path ahead that does not lead into the Valley of Lord of the
Flies must pass through a totalitarian autocracy. Since we're already
living in a totalitarian democratic despotism, it's possible an
autocracy will actually be an improvement for most of us.
"And what of the original Americans, the natives who lived on this
continent before the first Europeans arrived? What did this melting mean
for them? Unfortunately, that is something that the native-born,
culturally American, European-descended population is in the process of
finding out as it declines in the face of ever-growing numbers of
immigrants from vastly different cultures possessing rival traditions,
ideologies, and agendas of their own."
There are generally two kinds of cultural change agents that work to progress societytowards the utopian
dystopian ideals of our Brave New World Order. The first type are those
who self-identify as the liberal, progressive leftist, who openly and
proudly promotes the overthrow of classic American cultural heritage aka
the so-called hegemony of white-Christian-patriarchal-privilege. As
detestable as they are, at least they are somewhat honest when they
state their goals and objectives in attempting to change the face of the
nation.
The other kind of change agent is far more insidious and has caused far
more damage to the fabric of Western Civilization, and they have done so
while supposedly bearing the standard of opposition against the
liberal-progressive leftists. These are they who claim to be a part of
the opposition of the progressive leftists and cultural marxists working
to overthrow traditional American society, but their actions do not
match up with their words. They are the controlled opposition that have
co-opted the original conservative movement.
They have previously been called many different names, from RINOs to
NeoCons, yet none of these terms have ever really had much of an effect
on those who bore the mantle of "conservative" in bad faith. But the
latest term they have been branded with, Cuckservative, has been the
most effective rhetorical weapon to date ever devised to strike them
with. In the past year, the meme wars on teh Interewebz based on the newly coined term has hit them right between the eyes.
Who are the cuckservatives? Ye shall know them by their shrieks when they are confronted with teh tweets.
Seizing upon the opportunity of the proliferation of such a popular and
effective meme, John Red Eagle and Vox Day, two Indians (feathers, not
dots) have just released a new book, Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America.
"I bought this book because I wanted to indulge in schadenfraude! I
wanted to help the Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil punch back twice
as hard at the snivelling hordes of brainwashed lickspittles and useful
idiots that march under the banner of the SJW. No War but Culture War!
This book is a badly needed, long overdue counterattack against the long
march. For that, I consider it money and time well spent."
For much the same reasoning,I bought Cuckservative on
it's official release date this past Monday from Amazon, and finished
reading it by Wednesday. I enjoyed it and I did learn a few things that I
never knew before, such as the origins of the term "melting pot." But
more importantly, our Injun authors give us a historical perspective on
nations, cultures and heritage, and the effects mass immigration had on
them in many different times and places in world history. From
antiquity to the present day, they make a strong case that mass
immigration should be defined as nothing less than an act of war and
conquest.
Of particular interest, was their identification of the source of
American culture and heritage that is severely endangered from the
continued influx of foreigners unsuited and non-amenable to America's
nation-founding ideals:
As
much as it has changed over the years, American culture still has very
specific historical roots in English culture and history. Observe that
we say "English," not British, as the latter is more of a multicultural
political construct from an amalgamation of four nations than a true
national culture of its own. "American" is arguably well on its way to
becoming something more akin to "British" rather than "English." Those
who value American culture, and who would prefer to avoid seeing that
come to pass, would do well to develop an understanding of how America's
ancestral English culture came to be.
While going through a brief rundown of the history of English culture,
our Redskin co-authors identify two primary characteristics of this
"English" culture that served as the foundation for American culture:
self-reliant independence of the citizenry and the limitation of the
powers of a society's rulers.
As they point out, these cultural values are primarily upheld through
cultural transmission of a largely heterogeneous populace from one
generation to the next, and that subsequent hordes of migrants with
different values and beliefs will inevitably change them.
There
was no magic dirt. There was no shining city on a hill. All that was
required for irrevocable change was the arrival of sufficient numbers of
people with a separate culture of their own who were both willing and
able to hold onto it in the face of native opposition.
I came away with one very important idea from this work: the
litmus test for determining who is and who is not a cuckservative. While
they offer a twenty-two point bullet list as a field guide for
identifying a cuckservative in chapter 4, all one need do is to simply
look at
any so-called "right" wing politician or pundit and review their
statements
on the issue of mass migration (both legal and illegal; documented and
undocumented) from the third world to the
Anglo-sphere: the US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia.
Then compare and contrast with their stance on Israel's strict,
race-based immigration policy (for which I support Israel's right to do
so, 100%!) and that is all the info you need to identify a
cuckservative.
The
Cuckservative are the ones promoting the myths of the melting pot and
magic dirt to support the continued migrations of non-white,
non-Christians into all of these formerly white Christian majority
countries. The reasons usually given by such cuckservatives is based
mostly upon the appeal that conservatives must avoid being labelled
racist by the left.
In addition to a stated fear of being labelled as racist, many
cuckservatives who attribute the need for supporting mass migrations,
base it on an argument of falsified doctrine of Christian charity,
particularly the parable of the Good Samaritan. John
and Vox use both statistics, logic and scriptural citations to totally
destroy churchian-styled arguments based on the twisting of scripture.
While the book is filled with facts, statistics, charts and other
evidence to make their case against "conservatives", their strongest
rhetoric (at least for me personally, as I can certainly relate) comes
from playing the red card:
Import
people, and you import their culture. Import them on a small scale, as
with the Normans, and they may assimilate, but in doing so, they will
still influence yours. Import them on a larger scale, and they'll keep
their own culture, which will conflict with yours. Import them on a
large enough scale, as with the Saxons, and your culture will be the one
assimilated. And if that happens, you find yourselves at the mercy of
whatever the newcomers decide to do with you.
Trust us. We know.
Both of our Native American cultures have been all but eliminated. Our
tribes were forcibly expelled from their lands and forced onto
reservation, where they still live today. Neither of us knows more than a
few words of the languages our forefathers used to speak before the
arrival of Spanish and English immigrants.
The Magic Dirt won't save you.
I've got my own brown card to play, and I'll throw it in with John Red
Eagle's and Vox Day's red cards into the middle of the table. As the
descendent of a marginalized, occupied, dispossessed and miscegenated-unto-near-extinction
indigenous native people, I too echo the warning to those who still
value the founding American ideals of self reliance and limited
Government.
I see the new breed of conqueror, and their desired objectives would be
far worse for us all, than the life we managed to make under the regime
of the American pale face and it's original foundation of self-reliance
and limited Government.
I see the new breed of conqueror and I understand their overriding goal
is to bring all of the world's populations down to a lowest common
denominator of miscegenated homogeneity with no discernible cultural
heritage or identity that may one day serve as a rallying point to
resist their emerging tyranny of global governance.
I see the new breed of conqueror and I believe it is the defining fight
of our lives to resist their agenda of mass enfeeblement, arrested
development and over-reliance and dependence on a centralized, global
and tyrannical regime to govern every aspect of our micro-managed lives.
Make no mistakeabout it, this is ultimately the end goal of
those that the cuckservatives are working for. To get their Brave New
World Order, America as it was originally founded must first be
destroyed, and the cucking of conservatism is one of the primary means
for THEY to accomplish it.
As John and Vox put it:
The
uncomfortable truth is that cuckservatism not only betrays America's
posterity, it also betrays the intent of the other clauses of the
Preamble to the Constitution, including, "to form a more perfect
Union","establish Justice","insure domestic Tranquility","provide for
the common defence", and "promote the General Welfare", five things that
adding 60 million immigrants in 50 years have manifestly not done.
One
could make a very strong argument that thanks to their cuckservative
ideology, America's self-styled conservatives have literally betrayed
the entire purpose of the Constitution of the United States of America,
and in doing so, they have put the very survival of the nation at risk.
Yes indeed, these two Native American Injuns have in fact done exactly that in writing Cuckservative - How "Conservatives" Betrayed America.
Hair Raising:
Can a shocking YouTube video of a girl getting her curls brushed change attitudes about black hair?
By Teresa Wiltz
This
is another example of Sailer's Law of Female Journalism: The most
heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social
values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist
herself will be considered hotter-looking.
Technically, it might
seem highly possible that somebody named "Teresa Wiltz" has naturally
straight hair and is just writing out of a disinterested interest in the
topic. But, decades of reading female journalism at its most passionate
suggested to me that Ms. Wiltz's own looks would turn out to highly germane.
Yesterday Mike Cernovich announced that he would be publishing his next book, Last Man Standing,
with Castalia House. He also announced that he had accepted a position
as Editor-at-Large with Castalia House. What he did not mention, at my
request, is that he is also working with Castalia House on a third
project. I asked him not to mention it because I wanted to tell you
myself.
As dark lords go, I am, as most of you know, unusually civil. Having
asked one of my GGinParis co-hosts to write a foreword for one of my
books, I thought it would be a grievous breach of etiquette to fail to
request the same of the other. So, I am pleased to announce that the
aforementioned Editor-at-Large has already written the foreword for my
next book, which I have written with a fellow American Indian (albeit
one from a different tribe). It is expected to be released before the
end of year. It is a hard-hitting book in the vein of SJWAL, but
addresses an even more important and controversial subject: the politics
of American immigration.
The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America
contains an extremely important phrase that is almost always ignored by
those who appeal to it, or to the men who wrote it, in defense of
immigration. It states: We the people of the United States, in order to form a more
perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide
for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the
blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America. The key phrase is this: “to ourselves and our posterity.” The
blessings of liberty are not to be secured to all the nations of the
world, to the tired and huddled masses, or to the wretched refuse of the
teeming shores of other lands. They are to be secured to our children,
and their children, and their children's children. To sacrifice their interests to the interests of children in
other lands is to betray both past and future America. It is to permit
an alien posterity, like the newly hatched cuckoo in another bird's
nest, to eliminate our own, and in doing so, defeat the purpose of the
Constitution. It is, like the cuckolded husband, to raise the children
of another man instead of one's sons and daughters. It is, in a word, cuckservative.
Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America will be published in December by Castalia House.
