Day By Day by The Great Chris Muir

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Gender Ideology Harms Children - The American College of Pediatricians

Gender Ideology Harms Children

The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of male and female, respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.1
2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.2,3,4
3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V).5 The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.2,4,5
4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.6
5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.5
6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.7,8,9,10
7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries.11 What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?
8. Conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians
Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist
Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital

For a PDF version click here: Gender Ideology Harms Children.
CLARIFICATIONS in response to questions regarding points 3 & 5:
Regarding Point 3: “Where does the APA or DSM-V indicate that Gender Dysphoria is a mental disorder?”
The APA (American Psychiatric Association) is the author of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition(DSM-V). The APA states that those distressed and impaired by their GD meet the definition of a disorder. The College is unaware of any medical literature that documents a gender dysphoric child seeking puberty blocking hormones who is not significantly distressed by the thought of passing through the normal and healthful process of puberty.
From the DSM-V fact sheet:
“The critical element of gender dysphoria is the presence of clinically significant distress associated with the condition.”
“This condition causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.”
Regarding Point 5:  “Where does the DSM-V list rates of resolution for Gender Dysphoria?”
On page 455 of the DSM-V under “Gender Dysphoria without a disorder of sex development” it states: Rates of persistence of gender dysphoria from childhood into adolescence or adulthood vary. In natal males, persistence has ranged from 2.2% to 30%. In natal females, persistence has ranged from 12% to 50%.”  Simple math allows one to calculate that for natal boys: resolution occurs in as many as 100% – 2.2% = 97.8% (approx. 98% of gender-confused boys)  Similarly, for natal girls: resolution occurs in as many as 100% – 12% = 88% gender-confused girls
The bottom line:  Our opponents advocate a new scientifically baseless standard of care for children with a psychological condition (GD) that would otherwise resolve after puberty for the vast majority of patients concerned.  Specifically, they advise:  affirmation of children’s thoughts which are contrary to physical reality; the chemical castration of these children prior to puberty with GnRH agonists (puberty blockers which cause infertility, stunted growth, low bone density, and an unknown impact upon their brain development), and, finally, the permanent sterilization of these children prior to age 18 via cross-sex hormones. There is an obvious self-fulfilling nature to encouraging young GD children to impersonate the opposite sex and then institute pubertal suppression. If a boy who questions whether or not he is a boy (who is meant to grow into a man) is treated as a girl, then has his natural pubertal progression to manhood suppressed, have we not set in motion an inevitable outcome? All of his same sex peers develop into young men, his opposite sex friends develop into young women, but he remains a pre-pubertal boy. He will be left psychosocially isolated and alone. He will be left with the psychological impression that something is wrong. He will be less able to identify with his same sex peers and being male, and thus be more likely to self identify as “non-male” or female. Moreover, neuroscience reveals that the pre-frontal cortex of the brain which is responsible for judgment and risk assessment is not mature until the mid-twenties. Never has it been more scientifically clear that children and adolescents are incapable of making informed decisions regarding permanent, irreversible and life-altering medical interventions. For this reason, the College maintains it is abusive to promote this ideology, first and foremost for the well-being of the gender dysphoric children themselves, and secondly, for all of their non-gender-discordant peers, many of whom will subsequently question their own gender identity, and face violations of their right to bodily privacy and safety.
Please visit this page on the College website concerning sexuality and gender issues.
A PDF version of this page can be downloaded here: Gender Ideology Harms

1. Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development, “Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Disorders of Sex Development in Childhood.” Intersex Society of North America, March 25, 2006. Accessed 3/20/16 from
2. Zucker, Kenneth J. and Bradley Susan J. “Gender Identity and Psychosexual Disorders.” FOCUS: The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry. Vol. III, No. 4, Fall 2005 (598-617).
3. Whitehead, Neil W. “Is Transsexuality biologically determined?” Triple Helix (UK), Autumn 2000, p6-8. accessed 3/20/16 from; see also Whitehead, Neil W. “Twin Studies of Transsexuals [Reveals Discordance]” accessed 3/20/16 from
4. Jeffreys, Sheila. Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism. Routledge, New York, 2014 (pp.1-35).
5. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association, 2013 (451-459). See page 455 re: rates of persistence of gender dysphoria.
6. Hembree, WC, et al. Endocrine treatment of transsexual persons: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3132-3154.
7. Olson-Kennedy, J and Forcier, M. “Overview of the management of gender nonconformity in children and adolescents.” UpToDate November 4, 2015. Accessed 3.20.16 from
8. Moore, E., Wisniewski, & Dobs, A. “Endocrine treatment of transsexual people: A review of treatment regimens, outcomes, and adverse effects.” The Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2003; 88(9), pp3467-3473.
9. FDA Drug Safety Communication issued for Testosterone products accessed 3.20.16:
10. World Health Organization Classification of Estrogen as a Class I Carcinogen:
11. Dhejne, C, “Long-Term Follow-Up of Transsexual Persons Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery: Cohort Study in Sweden.” PLoS ONE, 2011; 6(2). Affiliation: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Accessed 3.20.16 from

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Books / Reading List

I have been meaning to keep a list of books TBR for a while. First post.

Summer Reading List

All right goyim, summer is here! Get ready for standard pool parties and of course, summer reading assignments. Here is a list of political and historical books I have found valuable and which could be considered part of an alt-right canon of sorts:
Patrick J. Buchanan, Suicide of a Superpower — Paleoconservative commentator Pat Buchanan has a number of titles dealing with American decline, but this one is the most relevant in my opinion. Much of his analysis of what is happening to the United States culturally and politically is very spot-on. The weakest point of the book is the emphasis on preserving the Christian identity of the United States, a statistical reality which will ironically survive the demographic changes Buchanan draws attention to elsewhere in the text. And considering how devoted the churches are to our colonization by the third world… He is still a very accessible author with good instincts about what is going wrong, but keep in mind that he gets to be a public figure because he stays just within the Overton window. Still a great read.

Guillaume Faye, Archaeofuturism — A French New Right author who I mentally refer to as William Fay, Guillaume Faye wrote Archaeofuturism almost twenty years ago. The book does not feel dated (except when he talks about 1980s far-right intellectuals in France and why they failed) and indeed many of his predictions are eerily correct, especially on Islamic terror (the book was published in 1998) and troubles in the eurozone. The French perspective is particular useful because they have no hangups about being critical of the United States, which is something we must be, and are based in Europe (obviously). If we are truly to build a nationalist order, the very American alt-right should remain informed of ideological developments in the homeland. Continental Europe and the Anglo-Saxon satellites have long seen the world very differently, and nowhere is this more obvious than in Faye’s zeal for European integration, an issue that remains deeply contentious.
David Hackett Fischer, Albion’s Seed  — I have written about this very long book before and I cannot recommend it enough. Fischer’s opus describes how four main ethno-religious and regional migrations out of the British Isles in the colonial period laid the foundations for the early United States. The history itself is interesting—I always wondered why astrology was more popular among Southerners and now I know why—but perhaps more important is the bigger picture, which is that the people you settle a land with are central to the culture that is created on it. This sounds obvious but has been buried by postmodern ways of thinking. While Fischer is largely fair in his assessment of the four regional cultures, I do feel he has a preference for the Puritan and Quaker societies over the Southern and Appalachian ones. For a more contemporary, shorter, and slightly pozzed version of this work, see Colin Woodard’s American Nations, which breaks the US into a whopping 11 deracinated regional cultures.
Gregory Hood, Waking Up from the American Dream — This is the newest book on the list, and one I recently reviewed. Hood is one of the most talented writers on the alt-right, and this book collects many of his recent essays related to issues of White identity and American politics. Hood offers a well-needed identitarian criticism of the American Dream, the conservative movement, and civic nationalism.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God that Failed  — I only read this book after becoming a nationalist, but for the meme value alone this fairly brief and often repetitive anarcho-capitalist treatise against democracy is worth a read. Hoppe represents the remnants of right-wing libertarianism, and as such emphasizes that we do not have to tolerate every sort of degeneracy foisted unto us by equality, or equality itself. Nor should we tolerate neighbors we didn’t ask for and which have no ties to our communities. An ever useful observation of the increasingly defunct libertarian movement, however, is that people respond to incentives, which is why Hoppe believes those who impugn society need to be threatened with physical punishment, if not physical removal. Looking ahead, Hoppe sees the Holy Roman Empire as a potential model for a disintegrating United States—an outcome of free cities and a loose affiliation of statelets is often overlooked by doomists. Interesting read even if you have no background in LARPy ancapistani fantasies.
Greg Johnson, New Right Versus Old Right — The flagship book of Counter-Currents, NROR is a succinct introduction to what the North American New Right is about, its metapolitical aims, and the importance of identity. With a philosopher’s attention to logic, Johnson makes his case premise by premise for why we need a homeland and why we aren’t villains for wanting one. Perhaps most importantly, Johnson addresses the issues of the failed Old Right that many overlook out of their contempt for our present situation.
Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique — No list would be complete without this formational text. McDonald provides one of the most well-researched and well-written takes on the JQ that’s ever been penned. Read it.
Benjamin Netanyahu, A Place Among the Nations — I know this sounds like a bizarre choice to include, but bear with me for a moment. This is a book written in defense of the world’s most maligned extant ethnostate and settler colony by one of the most successful right-wing nationalist politicians in history. Zionism is a lot of things to a lot of different people, but one thing it isn’t is a failure. There is a lot of quality rhetoric and framing here that is worth learning from and even appropriating. The combination of history, romanticism, ethnocentrism, logistical awareness, and personal commitment that inform the likudnik worldview are all important to its enduring success in Israeli politics.
T. Lothrop Stoddard, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy — Almost nothing in this classic text is outdated. The predicted collapse of European imperialism, the rise of China and radical Islam, and the anticipated demographic pressure and migrations from the colored global south all came true. Another interesting facet of Rising Tide is that its narrative of Western decline predates WWII, which so many theorists tend to focus on. It was WWI that saw the huge use of colored levies in Europe and mass racial suicide first, both of which spiritually and materially broke Europe. Stoddard also makes the crucial distinction between rule and settlement of a territory, the idea of outer and inner dikes of our racial patrimony. A well-populated settler colony like the United States is an extension of Europe in a way that the British Raj was not. In our times, the outer dikes have been torn down and the inner dikes are undergoing the same process. If you read anything, read this.
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf — There aren’t many books which can lay claim to having altered the course of world history, but this is one of them. AH isn’t a particularly great writer either, but the observations, insights, tactics, and paradigms in here are worth looking at. And like any narrative which has transcended time and history there is an impulse for the reader to fit it to their own circumstances. One might argue that the Austria-Hungary and Weimar Republic that AH railed against have met their match in the United States, which seems to combine the worst traits of both, minoritization of the core nation and entrenched social and moral rot. No matter how much of Mein Kampf or its derivative NS you agree (or disagree) with, I think it will have an impact on how you view the crises of our era. Many on the alt-right find it useful to be familiar with cultural marxism and its canon, but I think it also important to be familiar with what cultural marxism is a reaction against, national socialism, which itself was a reaction to judaeo-bolshevism. This struggle has  been going on for a long time.

Tuesday, November 8, 2016

No Right To Whites

No Right To Whites

Max Wifeschild

You don’t have the right to white people.
You don’t have the right to denigrate our history and traditions and then lay claim to what we’ve built.
You don’t have the right to ruin our children in your social experiments called public schools.
You don’t have the right to ruin our lives and livelihoods with your imported savages.
You don’t have the right to us.
We are going to determine our own future. We are going to determine our own lives.
Our lives are not improved with diversity. Our lives are not improved with multiculturalism. Our lives are not improved by those spreading these poisonous ideas. We are going to stop you.
We gave you our cities. We gave you our infrastructure. We gave you our neighborhoods. Now, you want our nations, children, and even our lives.
We are not giving you any more. Fuck you.
You don’t have a right to us. You can have your crappy culture. You can have your crappy communities. You can have your crappy way of life you made for yourselves. You can have your broken, backwards cultures that created your broken, backwards nations. But no, you can’t have us.
We are done with you and your enablers. We are not going to retreat any longer. Our numbers are growing each day with a righteous hatred of what has been done to us. We are going to fight and we are going to win

Thursday, September 8, 2016

On Free Trade

See this Vox Day post:

The Libertarian Case for Free Trade

And please note that for the most of my short life I would have/did describe myself as a sort of Anarcho-Capitalist with Traditionalist leanings. (Warning: Language)

Fantasy and Reality, which will you choose? The life and preservation of the West and its cultures or universalism/internationism without self determination, which will you choose?

(warning: language)

This is all complete mental masturbation as there is no such thing as free trade except in the fantasy sense.

This simple truth kills the whole argument. Until there is a completely level playing field, there is no free trade.

As most countries view themselves as nation-states with national interests, it will ALWAYS be this way unless there is a One World Governmental body.

It seems that only the West is not allowed to seek its own best interests.

One side is playing the trade war and the West is lying down and spreading its collective legs.

When someone speaks the magic spell of free trade, they should be slapped accordingly. They are mentally masturbating to their own theoretical musings of a utopian/fantasy world and nothing more.

Free trade is internationalism/universalism. All cultures will have to be subsumed for it to exist (the benefit of the free movement of labour)

Free trade is utopian mind bullshit. Free trade is anti-West. As a former AnCap, I can't believe how long it took me to see what an autiste I was in this. Now I look at those who still believe this bullshit and wonder how can the intelligent be so damn stupid. They are either too involved with the theory and not the real world, or this is the other side of the communist/marxist coin as a Hegelian mambo death dance for the West.

Also from the comments:

1. James Dixon:
Seriously? Is this the best case they have to offer?

Just one example: However, when you look at our deficits, when you look at it from any standpoint, you begin with the fact that the trade deficit of the US in total is 3% of gross domestic product.

First, it's 3% every year. Year after year after year. The effect is cumulative. Secondly, once a factory moves, it doesn't come back. Those jobs are gone forever. The jobs that supposedly replace it won't be in the same area. But I guess everyone is just supposed to abandon their homes and families and move wherever the the jobs are, and move again five years later when things change again, right?

Second: ...and say that libertarian principles dictate that we should have the freedom to trade, whether it be with a foreigner or with somebody domestic. Nobody has a right to interfere in our right to trade with whomever we please when we perceive mutual benefit.

Tariffs don't stop trade. They merely make you pay more for foreign trade. Just as local and state taxes make things cost more in a given area. It's a matter of how we choose to fund government that works to our best advantage. If we choose to do so via tariffs rather than other taxes, well, that's our decision to make.

2. Tim:
To address only one statement. The problem with losing 3% of jobs to free trade is that represents ONE YEAR. Next year, we have another 3% trade deficit, and there go .03x.97 jobs, and pretty soon the labor participation rate is in the .50s. Hmm, where is labor participation in the US? Oh yeah. If it was really free trade, that 3% would be dropping, and would have reversed by now. But when Mexico and China for example keep their wages and currency artificially low and weak respectively, then the bleeding never stops. In Mexico, the rich get very rich indeed, and the Mexican worker gets marginally better off.....and the American worker is hosed. The same for China, where to you think all those Chinese oligarchs got all those billions? Free trade can work...but only if it is really free trade...and it is still just a leveling between the partners. The United States was so rich we should have pulled Mexico right up to where we were...but in Mexico, the rich saw the benefits, and kept the poor poor, and after 20 years there has been no change....except the working class in the US has suffered.

3. dc.sunsets:
Concentrated benefit, diffuse cost is a problem everywhere, but note how "free trade" embeds it down to the level of the individual choosing where to buy toilet paper.

For 50 years (35 years on overdrive) people in the USA have borrowed in order to enter the marketplace.

The result?
1. GDP ramped higher because borrowing isn't backed out of its bottom line. Discussions of GDP today are rendered worthless, like discussion of the plot of a fictional universe novel.
2. The relative utility of being productive fell, because Say's Law (in order to consume, you must first produce) was placed in stasis...or bludgeoned into a coma, thus instead of production, people increasingly engaged in parlor tricks (the FIRE economy) as a means to great wealth.
3. Monetary wealth (US$) in the form of owning bonds began to FLOOD into the world, seemingly from nowhere. Perception of riches (by sitting on piles of IOU's) skyrocketed, encouraging a spending spree in one market after another.
4. Trade deficits exploded as Americans traded IOU-dollars to export-mercantilist foreigners for inexpensive (price-suppressed) trinkets from clothing to iPhones.
5. A sense of unlimited resources pervaded the entire West. Congress had no limit on spending because every bond issued by the US Treasury was deemed WEALTH so every time Congress pissed away another dollar on some boondoggle, the "economy" was richer by #1 the amount spent and #2 the amount of the bond that was issued to spend it.

Yes, this hammer is my only tool so every problem in today's world looks to me like a nail...BUT...every problem in today's world arises, if you peel the onion enough, from this putrid swamp of monetary con-artistry.

Free trade? Where, when "money" is so detached from production? Consumer sovereignty, when the cumulative "concentrated benefits/diffuse costs" end up being a vast NET CATASTROPHE for people in the USA due to stupid political edicts driven by a complete and total misunderstanding of what is really happening?

For nearly my whole life we've lived under a system of monetary dishonesty so profound and pervasive that it has befuddled the minds of nearly everyone, high and low. Karl Denninger's metaphor of the pond where lily pads double in sq.ft. is quite apt; Now, after 20 years of wage and price stagnation despite a quadrillion dollars in "new wealth" "created" by borrowing, the cracks are appearing in the columns holding up this vast house of cards.

Trade policies of the last 50 years helped HIDE the dishonesty by keeping prices of goods artificially suppressed. Immigration policies of the last 50 years helped HIDE the dishonest by keeping wages artificially suppressed.

And the ASSholes who benefited from this system to the tune of million-dollar yachts and beachfront condo penthouses want to keep the game going.

No. Shit. 

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

The Incoherence of Conservatism - Vox Day

The incoherence of conservatism

I don't know who "Publius Decius Mus" is, except in the Samnite War sense, but this is the best article I have ever read at the Claremont Institute. It very clearly makes the case for the need for the Alt-Right, if not for the Alt-Right per se. And in doing so, it also underlines the petty narcissism of the dwindling #NeverTrump crowd:
If conservatives are right about the importance of virtue, morality, religious faith, stability, character and so on in the individual; if they are right about sexual morality or what came to be termed “family values”; if they are right about the importance of education to inculcate good character and to teach the fundamentals that have defined knowledge in the West for millennia; if they are right about societal norms and public order; if they are right about the centrality of initiative, enterprise, industry, and thrift to a sound economy and a healthy society; if they are right about the soul-sapping effects of paternalistic Big Government and its cannibalization of civil society and religious institutions; if they are right about the necessity of a strong defense and prudent statesmanship in the international sphere—if they are right about the importance of all this to national health and even survival, then they must believe—mustn’t they?—that we are headed off a cliff.

But it’s quite obvious that conservatives don’t believe any such thing, that they feel no such sense of urgency, of an immediate necessity to change course and avoid the cliff. A recent article by Matthew Continetti may be taken as representative—indeed, almost written for the purpose of illustrating the point. Continetti inquires into the “condition of America” and finds it wanting. What does Continetti propose to do about it? The usual litany of “conservative” “solutions,” with the obligatory references to decentralization, federalization, “civic renewal,” and—of course!—Burke. Which is to say, conservatism’s typical combination of the useless and inapt with the utopian and unrealizable. Decentralization and federalism are all well and good, and as a conservative, I endorse them both without reservation. But how are they going to save, or even meaningfully improve, the America that Continetti describes? What can they do against a tidal wave of dysfunction, immorality, and corruption? “Civic renewal” would do a lot of course, but that’s like saying health will save a cancer patient. A step has been skipped in there somewhere. How are we going to achieve “civic renewal”? Wishing for a tautology to enact itself is not a strategy.

Continetti trips over a more promising approach when he writes of “stress[ing] the ‘national interest abroad and national solidarity at home’ through foreign-policy retrenchment, ‘support to workers buffeted by globalization,’ and setting ‘tax rates and immigration levels’ to foster social cohesion." That sounds a lot like Trumpism. But the phrases that Continetti quotes are taken from Ross Douthat and Reihan Salam, both of whom, like Continetti, are vociferously—one might even say fanatically—anti-Trump. At least they, unlike Kesler, give Trump credit for having identified the right stance on today’s most salient issues. Yet, paradoxically, they won’t vote for Trump whereas Kesler hints that he will. It’s reasonable, then, to read into Kesler’s esoteric endorsement of Trump an implicit acknowledgment that the crisis is, indeed, pretty dire. I expect a Claremont scholar to be wiser than most other conservative intellectuals, and I am relieved not to be disappointed in this instance.

Yet we may also reasonably ask: What explains the Pollyanna-ish declinism of so many others? That is, the stance that Things-Are-Really-Bad—But-Not-So-Bad-that-We-Have-to-Consider-Anything-Really-Different! The obvious answer is that they don’t really believe the first half of that formulation. If so, like Chicken Little, they should stick a sock in it. Pecuniary reasons also suggest themselves, but let us foreswear recourse to this explanation until we have disproved all the others.

Whatever the reason for the contradiction, there can be no doubt that there is a contradiction. To simultaneously hold conservative cultural, economic, and political beliefs—to insist that our liberal-left present reality and future direction is incompatible with human nature and must undermine society—and yet also believe that things can go on more or less the way they are going, ideally but not necessarily with some conservative tinkering here and there, is logically impossible.

Let’s be very blunt here: if you genuinely think things can go on with no fundamental change needed, then you have implicitly admitted that conservatism is wrong. Wrong philosophically, wrong on human nature, wrong on the nature of politics, and wrong in its policy prescriptions. Because, first, few of those prescriptions are in force today. Second, of the ones that are, the left is busy undoing them, often with conservative assistance. And, third, the whole trend of the West is ever-leftward, ever further away from what we all understand as conservatism.
One thing that I expect has become clear to most readers here, whether of the Alt-Right or the conservative persuasion, is that conservatism is utterly unequipped to deal with the current situation. Even if conservatism were a coherent ideology - it isn't, read Cuckservative - or if it were not partially culpable for the current situation - and it is - conservatives are both intellectually unarmed and emotionally unprepared to deal with the ongoing transition from ideology politics to identity politics.

A favorite phrase of mine is, "let reason be silent when experience gainsays its conclusions." Conservatives correctly point out the ways in which American liberalism, Leftism, and progressivism all fail the test of experience. However, conservatives completely fail to recognize their own pie-in-the-sky thinking when they appeal to Magic Dirt, Magic Words, and the Zeroth Amendment. They do not understand the significance of the Supreme Court's version of the US Constitution not being the same as the original written version of the Constitution, they are unaware that most immigrants, children of immigrants, and grandchildren of immigrants neither know nor care what any version of "the Constitution" is, says, or represents, and they ignore the very purpose of the Constitution as laid out in the Preamble.

Most importantly, they elevate a single phrase from the Declaration of Independence, a meaninglessly utopian piece of rhetoric which is not only contradicted by the Preamble, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the acts of the First Congress, but by subsequent phrases in the Declaration itself, and proclaim it to be the foundational core of both state and nation. To conservatives, "all men are created equal" is a Magic Spell of unlimited potency that is not only, contra literally ALL the evidence, historically definitional, but can even be invoked to instantly transform any individual, tribe, people, or nation into Americans.

However, neither the Magic Spell nor the Magic Words prevented the Civil War, or if you prefer, the Second War for Independence. And the Magic Words will not prevent Round Two, or if you prefer, the Third War for Independence, or what is considerably more likely to be the free-for-all that follows the general collapse of the US central state. Very few saw the Soviet collapse coming, and I expect even fewer genuinely see the US collapse coming, despite the profiteering of opportunistic media doomsayers who have never seen an Apocalypse, a Ragnarok, or a Rapture they didn't like.

Where conservatism has proven intrinsically fragile and self-contradictory, the Alt-Right is anti-fragile and intellectually consistent. A nation has considerably more ruin in it than a state; the state cannot survive long without a single dominant nation but as the Jews, the Kurds, and many other peoples have proved, a nation can survive indefinitely without a state. The architects of 4GW theory and the globalists alike have chronicled the way in which we are coming to the end of the Westphalian period where the state held a monopoly on violence. Therefore, it should surprise no one that as the international state system is in the process of coming to an end, the ideology politics that arose within it and subsequently dominated it should also be in decline.

So, conservatism is not merely incoherent, it is now as entirely irrelevant as a biplane during the Battle of Britain. Neither a Balanced Budget Amendment nor pledging undying loyalty to AIPAC nor deciding to "rededicate ourselves to the notion of liberty for which generations of Americans fought and died" are going to even begin to address the implications of the post-Westphalian shift to identity politics, much less prevent the collapse of the USA.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

What the Alt Right is - Vox Day

What the Alt Right is

In the interest of developing a core Alt Right philosophy upon which others can build.
  1. The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right.
  2. The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk's 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
  3. The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
  4. The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.
  5. The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
  6. The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
  7. The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
  8. The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
  9. The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
  10. The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
  11. The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
  12. The Alt Right doesn't care what you think of it.
  13. The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
  14. The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
  15. The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
  16. The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.
TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

100+ Reasons to Cease & Desist from Any Further Holocaust Commemoration

100+ Reasons to Cease & Desist from Any Further Holocaust Commemoration

5,543 words

Editor’s Note:
Dara Halley-James is the pseudonym of an author who has published well-received “mainstream” books under her real name. The following is the first in an extended series of excerpts from the penultimate draft of the forthcoming book The Sixty Million: How Leading Jewish Communists, Zionists and Neocons Brought on a Dozen Holocausts.

1. The ‘vale of tears’ fabrication that implies that average Jews have had it much worse over the past millennium than have average Gentiles, when in fact Jewish evolutionary strategy has been to ally Jewish communities with the higher ranks of the Gentile ‘powers that be’, which invariably entailed the protection of the Jewish community by those ‘powers that be’ in return for rendering the economic service of optimally exploiting the peasantry—that protection and economic role constituting a highly-desirable combination that would have been the envy of Gentile commoners.
2. The odes to genocide in the ‘Old Testament’, which sanctified a sub-human practice that would have been decried by any non-tribal non-sadistic God.
3. The Bolshevik ‘revolution’ was a de-facto counter-revolution, whose conception, execution, defense, consolidation and extension would have been utterly impossible absent Jewish leadership. Thereby destroyed were the democratic achievements of the real Russian-made revolutions of 1905 and February 1917.
4. The Red Terror of 1918 constituted a ruthless decimation of Russian society undertaken by a predominantly-Jewish Bolshevik government deploying a predominantly Jewish-led Cheka (secret police force) in response to the shootings of Lenin and another high-ranking official. The Red Terror led inexorably to civil war, a war against the nations (i.e., Ukraine, Poland), the suppression of a genuine revolution of the peasantry, the devastating famine of the early 1920s that killed several millions, the extermination or exile of the more successful farmers (the so-called ‘kulaks’), the devastation of the Russian Orthodox Church, the formation of a dictatorial police state, the ordeal and grand failure of forced collectivization of agriculture, the agony of slavery-assisted forced breakneck-speed industrialization to try to make up for a lost decade, a deliberately-engineered famine that starved to death more than six million agricultural workers and nomads, the quasi-genocide/mass exile of Soviet Poles during the Great Terror, the horrors of the Gulag’s vast network of concentration camps, and decades of totalitarian Stalinist despotism — the foregoing entailing the often-excruciating deaths of 20 million Soviet citizens. Even worse, all this conjured up — and for good reason — Communism’s nemesis: Adolf Hitler, whose invasion of the USSR would kill a mind-boggling additional 27 million Soviet citizens. The Bolshevik coup and ‘the most Jewish government since the Second Temple’, anchored by an intelligentsia, bureaucracy, secret police and military intelligence that each had a Jewish backbone, cost a mere 47 million lives. What is the Jewish Holocaust compared to that?
5. So as to pre-pay the British for committing to the upcoming Balfour Declaration, President Woodrow Wilson’s circle of Jewish advisers persuaded the president to go back on his very-recent election pledge and take the U.S. into World War I, which would ensure Palestine’s takeover as a mandate by Britain once the U.S. had won the war, that result in turn ensuring implementation of the Balfour Declaration’s provisions. U.S. intervention would lead to Germany’s complete defeat and utter humiliation, rather than to an otherwise-likely saw-off with Britain and France and large territorial gains at Bolshevik Russia’s expense. The unjustifiably vindictive Treaty of Versailles that ensued conjured up the danger that an irredentist nationalist leader like Hitler would arise in response and develop a substantial following. Thus did tribe-centric pressures exerted by leading Jews upon on the British and then the American government alter the course of history for the worse, for everybody, not just for the Jews of Europe.
6. Via Wilson’s switch from isolationist to ‘total war’ warrior, the transformation of a local outbreak of influenza in a single American town into a raging worldwide epidemic of ‘Spanish Flu’ (obviously mislabelled) that killed about 75 million people, mostly teens and twenty-somethings, including more U.S. soldiers than died in battle during World War I.
7. The genuine terrifying of Europe by several certifiably Jewish-led Communist revolutions of the post-World War I era, some of them successful if only in the short-term.
8. In Russia, the predominantly-Jewish Bolshevik installation of a dictatorial party-state that always ran the risk of degenerating into a bona fide despotism, as it eventually did under Stalin for decades.
9. The transformation of Russia’s Imperial army into Trotsky’s Red Army, an institution as inhumane to its own soldiers as the most brutal army to its foes.
10. For attributing strictly-anti-Semitic motives to Simon Petliura’s Ukrainian nationalists, post-revolution, when in fact Jews were perceived, largely correctly, as favoring Communist conquest of Ukraine by Russia in lieu of Ukraine’s recently-established independence, that feared conquest soon occurring, with the result that nine million + Ukrainians would perish under Stalin whose régime’s core intelligentsia, bureaucracy, military intelligence and (until 1939) secret police were Jewish.
11. In conjunction with the heavily-Jewish German Communist Party, the largely-Jewish-directed Comintern’s bizarre facilitating of Hitler’s rise to power.
12. Via a Stalinist régime whose core intelligentsia, bureaucracy, secret police and military intelligence were Jewish and which was co-directed by Jewish politburo-heavyweight Lazar Kaganovich, the mass murder via the torture of starvation of 6.3 million Ukrainians, Russians and Kazaks during the ‘Terror Famine’ of 1932-33, a decade prior to ‘The’ Holocaust.
13. The Jewish-owned New York Times’ innovation of Holocaust-denial, as applied to the Terror-Famine, netting the paper’s correspondent in the Soviet Union a Pulitzer Prize, never withdrawn despite the stupendous lies in his dispatches.
14. The propping up of Hitler in power via Zionist sabotage of what I call ‘the Great Boycott’ (see forthcoming excerpts) and via the boycott’s replacement by the Zionist/Nazi-made Transfer Agreement. (White Nationalists who approve of Hitler as a German nationalist and as a scourge of Stalinist Communism can still agree that Jews were unwittingly engineering their own downfall by dramatically supporting Hitler in the early going and then dramatically turning against him after Kristallnacht, thereby tragically diverting him westward on what would otherwise have been a virtually-uninterrupted march on Moscow.)
15. During the 1930s, usually under close Jewish supervision, the development of the Gulag archipelago where 18 million citizens would be incarcerated at one time or another in the Communist equivalent of Nazi-concentration camps, more than two million dying miserably therein, including tens of thousands worked to death on ill-planned mega-projects such as canals and railways destined to be under-used, totally useless or even abandoned before completion.
16. Jewish pressures on FDR to oblige Britain to abandon appeasement on Poland’s doorstep, possibly the greatest diplomatic blunder in history.
17. In cooperation with Hitler, the culturally-genocidal decapitation of Polish society by ‘the most Jewish government since the Second Temple’.
18. The false claim of Jews to being the first group-victim of Hitler’s penchant for mass-murder, when in that respect Hitler prioritized both Poland’s Catholic intelligentsia and the physically/mentally handicapped well ahead of the Jews.
19. The decapitation of Byelorussia’s intelligentsia by the Stalinist régime, the core of whose intelligentsia, bureaucracy and military intelligence were Jewish. The NKVD doing the killing was no longer Jewish-dominated at this point, but its continuing ethos had been shaped largely by Jewish NKVD generals for two decades
20. All the cruel Stalinist deportations of entire ethnic communities, including the Volga Germans, to Siberia or the like, deportations abetted by a bureaucracy whose core was Jewish.
21. Orthodox and Hasidic Jews are taught not to risk their own lives to save the life of a Gentile. Had Catholic Poles been even more persecuted and Polish Jews not at all during World War II, there would have been few if any ‘righteous Jews’ saving Catholic Poles.
22. Browbeaten by his Jewish circle of advisers, FDR’s bending of the U.S. Lend-Lease policy so generously toward the USSR that not only did Hitler not conquer the Stalinist USSR, Stalin soon became the most powerful man on earth for the U.S.-equivalent of another two presidential terms, disastrous terms that saw the spread of Communism to Eastern Europe, China and North Korea, the latter two régimes still in power today.
23. The Jewish/Soviet propaganda-abetted brutal gang rapes and often murders of two million (!) German women and young girls by the Red Army in the closing months of the war.
24. The fabrication that the famously-photographed emaciated survivors of Nazi concentration camps in Germany were nearly all Jewish, when in fact the bulk were non-Jewish, starving not due to Nazi sadism but due to the Allies’ food blockade.
25. The invariably-bloody deaths of as many U.S., U.K., Commonwealth and West European troops as Jews gassed during the war, although few know this owing to relentless propagandizing of the Holocaust-centric view of World War II.
26. One part of the Holocaust total of 5 million (which I accept mostly for the sake of argument) is the 700,000+ Soviet Jews killed mainly by the Nazis’ Einsatzgruppen via mass-shootings. However, a problem with mourning these victims indefinitely is that Soviet Jews made up at least half the elite of the Soviet intelligentsia, and the Nazis killing off Soviet Jews in great numbers was not much different than what the Soviets and Nazis together did to the Polish intelligentsia 1939-1941. Moreover, had the Soviet Jewish victims been spared, their highly-educated expertise (and that of the next generation) would surely have rendered the USSR an even more formidable foe of the West than it did become. So on these Soviet Jews’ behalf, the international Jewish community should never have been able to wring out of Western Gentiles anything more than crocodile tears. (Churchill’s systematic terror-bombing of civilian targets in Germany, to which Hitler eventually retaliated in kind, also killed 700,000, including a few hundred thousand German children.)
27. Another part of the Holocaust total is about a million West European Jews, but these were precisely the kind of over-achieving social-domination-driven Jews that both anti-Semites and Zionists agreed were eroding traditional German and other European cultures and would be much better off removed to Palestine. If Zionists had gotten their way, all European Jews would have emigrated to Jewish Palestine, immersed themselves in its culture and evolved into card-carrying Gentile-spurners. So why should Gentiles — especially 70 years later — be genuflecting to today’s Zionists (that is, nearly all living Jews) by mourning these people? Enough already.
28. For the false claim spread everywhere throughout the world for half a century that of any ethno-religious groups killed by dictatorship in the 1930s and 1940s, Jews were by far the hardest-hit group, when in fact the number of Ukrainians killed in that era exceeds the Jewish death toll by more than four million.
29. That the most sadistic concentration camp commandant of World War II, in Soviet-conquered Eastern Europe 1944-45, was a Jew: Shlomo Morel, whose main victims, typically tortured to death, were non-Nazi ethnic Germans and nationalist Poles. The repellent Morel lived out his post-war days contentedly in Israel, which naturally refused to extradite him to Poland for trial.
30. For the millions of German civilians and conscripts who ended up dying because Jewish Communists assisted Hitler’s rise to power and because Jewish Zionists propped him up in power at a time (1933-34) when delivering a coup-de-grace to Hitler via ‘The Great Boycott’ was the eminently-do-able alternative.
31. That the true statement: ‘far more Germans than Jews died in World War II’, would surprise the vast majority of the public worldwide, even the German public.
32. For the lack of acknowledgement in Jewish writing that for more than a decade and a half after the war, there was absolutely no conception of ‘The Holocaust’ as separated out from the tens of millions of non-Jews killed in the war.
33. For the key Jewish contribution to the establishment of suffocatingly-oppressive Communist regimes in Eastern Europe after the war (ie. Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania), régimes that endured for generations, inflicting untold misery on tens of millions of inhabitants.
34. For the decades-long infestation of Western European parliaments with Communists thanks to the inspiring victory of Stalin’s Communist régime in ‘the Great Patriotic War’, Hitler’s ascent to power having been made possible by a Jewish-dominated Comintern/German Communist party/Zionist leadership, and indispensable contributions to his annihilation having been made by Soviet Jews.
35. For Menachem Begin’s having invented Middle-Eastern terror and for having even boasted on American television of having invented not just Middle-Eastern terror but ‘world terror’.
36. For the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under the cover of ‘a war of independence’ and then misrepresenting that repellent operation (featuring one massacre after another) for the next half-century, as well as for suppressing any public memorialization of the Nakba (catastrophe) by Israel’s Palestinian citizens.
37. In the first decades of Israel’s existence, Israelis totally disdained the Holocaust (not yet conceived and labelled as such) and its survivors, and were repelled by the mentality of Israel’s Orthodox or Hasidic immigrants, whose kin constituted 60 percent of the Holocaust death toll and whom Gentiles, in contradistinction, are being continually browbeaten into commemorating presumably until the end of time.
38. For the Korean war: as enabled by the largely-Jewish spying on the Manhattan Project, in turn enabling the Soviets to explode their own duplicate atomic bomb by 1949, which in turn emboldened Stalin to approve the North’s invasion of the South.
39. McCarthyism: a botch-up, but provoked by all-too-real Soviet spying and infiltration of the U.S. government as orchestrated in the main by Soviet Jews and carried out by members of the American Communist Party, the latter so Jewish an institution as to elicit the inside joke that its meetings could have been conducted in Yiddish.
40. The unjustified invasion of Egypt in 1956 by Israel along with France and Britain, soon nullified by an irate President Eisenhower whom Israel et al. had not even bothered to inform in advance.
41. For inventing the third worst idea of the 19th century — Freudianism — and even conflating it with Communism whenever such obfuscation seemed to shore up Marxist beliefs and undermine traditional Western values, not to mention giving pseudo-scientific credence to the entirely-bogus notion of an ‘anti-Semitic psychosis’ — deployed to smear alleged enemies of Jewry/Israel.
42. The bestowal upon Muslim and Christian Palestinians of a variant of 1930s American deep-south segregation and its second-class citizenship for blacks. Israeli ethnic hatred for Israeli Palestinians as well as West Bank and Gaza Palestinians is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
43. For the hate crime of portraying Polish, Ukrainian and Baltic anti-Jewish feeling and actions as emanating from some sort of causeless psychosis when in fact there were very concrete, very obvious causes for such inter-ethnic animosity, some rooted in history, some in more contemporary events.
44. For ‘triumphant Communism’, Jews having proven as indispensable thereto as to every other stage of Communism’s growth. The worthy motive of countering triumphant Communism would draw the U.S. into a catastrophic Vietnam war that would kill 58,000 American soldiers, and more than a million Vietnamese. The conflict between pro-war and anti-war factions within the U.S. generated a cultural divide that never closed and may have even widened over time.
45. For the soul-stultifying and mass-death-inducing catastrophes of Communist rule in China, Vietnam, Cambodia and North Korea, unimaginable absent absolutely-essential Jewish contributions to Marxist ideology and Communism that culminated in the Soviet Union’s complete victory in World War II, with its political system subsequently held up a model to be emulated in the East.
46. For the Jewish-Democrats’ imposition of LBJ as vice-presidential candidate upon the LBJ-despising JFK, an unmitigated disaster once JFK was assassinated by a die-hard Communist and LBJ took over the Vietnam portfolio as a foreign-policy naïf.
47. Without three decades of absolutely indispensable Jewish contributions, there would have been no ideologically-driven USSR in existence to forge a Cold War with the West, a Cold War that almost went nuclear 1962.
48. For turning the Middle-East into a nexus for Cold War confrontation by obliging Egypt and other Arab nations to seek arms from the Soviets that they could not get from the U.S. owing to Israel lobby pressures, thereby creating Soviet client states where the U.S. could least tolerate them given the U.S. economy’s dependence on cheap Middle-Eastern oil.
49. For the ‘Six-day War’ of 1967 — a long-anticipated pre-calculated war of conquest, never the war of survival or defense as per the fabrications of Israel and its lobby then and ever since.
50. The deliberate, unprovoked, and appallingly-vicious attack by the IOF (Israeli Offense Forces) on the unmistakably-American spy-ship USS Liberty at the tail-end of the Six-Day War, intended to sink the vessel and kill its entire 294-member crew, not just the 34 men it did kill (while wounding 171), foiled only by the ineptitude of Israel’s navy and by the Liberty’s whip-smart/heroic radio-man (responsible for saving both the ship and hundreds of lives). Then there was Israel and its lobby blatantly lying about the attack on the Liberty ever since, perhaps terminally corrupting the U.S. government via their collaborative cover-up over the next the next half-century. (Where is the movie focusing on the Liberty’s heroic radio-operator? Thanks to Jewish domination of Hollywood, this would-be American classic will never be made.)
51. The deliberate cultivating via Jewish power within media and academe of the now-deeply-embedded-but-utterly-false notion that Hitler intended the genocide of European Jewry from ‘day one’, when in fact only after longer than the equivalent of two U.S. presidential terms did Hitler change his longstanding policy of prodding Jews to emigrate, to mass-killing them. The latter was an improvisation based on the facts that i) Hitler had nowhere he could send his millions of unwanted Jewish captives to, those captives being well-motivated to take reprisals on the Nazis, ii) Hitler had no way to feed them adequately, given severe food shortages both within Germany and on the Eastern front iii) Germany’s very survival would be jeopardized should the Wehrmacht continue to fail to prevail against Russia, with Jewish partisans and backing for partisans soon to become a significant contributor to that failure. The instigators of the Soviet Terror-Famine had nothing even remotely similar by way of plausible excuses.
52. For the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by a Palestinian understandably enraged by RFK’s ultra-pro-Israeli foreign policy despite Israel’s recent aggressive war of conquest.
53. For Israel’s subterfuge and fabrications and hypocrisy regarding the development of its huge nuclear arsenal and for the subsequent impossibility of making the Middle East a nuclear-weapons-free zone.
54. For causing the oil crisis that began in 1973, which need never have happened had Israel responded to any of Egypt’s multiple peace proposals following the 1967 war, proposals not essentially different from the Camp David Accord signed in 1979. Production cutbacks and consequent skyrocketing oil prices were the oil sheiks’ response to the immediacy and extent of military re-provisioning for Israel as overseen by Henry Kissinger during the Yom Kippur war, that war a direct result of Israel’s half-decade of intransigence. The upshot in the West was stagflation in the mid-to-late 1970s and a deep recession in the early 1980s, overall an economic calamity that brought the post-war boom to a grinding halt for a full decade. (De-railing modernization in Africa was another unhappy Israel-caused result.)
55. For the moral decline of the U.S. as it scrambled, worldwide, to prop up even the most hideous of régimes as long as they opposed the spread of Communism, a real threat and one that need never have arisen in the first place absent indispensable Jewish contributions to that ideology and its political implementation.
56. For General Ariel Sharon’s pulverizing of one the world’s most beautiful cities, Beirut, Lebanon, while trying to kill future Nobel Peace Prize winner Yasser Arafat.
57. For General Ariel Sharon’s close supervision of the mass-murder of Palestinians in refugee camps situated right under Sharon’s nose, the operation having been farmed out to Israel’s ‘so-called ‘Christian’ Falangist allies, and then the General’s reinstatement in the cabinet after a token wrist-slap, the Israeli electorate eventually rewarding him with the prime minister-ship.
58. For Jewish-American corruption of the United Nations (on behalf on Israel) right from the get-go and for Israel’s rendering that body fundamentally-dysfunctional in certain crucial respects, such as being unable to censure Israel itself for unacceptable behavior, given that the U.S.’s Israel lobby would see to it that American representatives vetoed any such censure.
59. For the imposition of a Holocaust culture and even Holocaust guilt upon the U.S. despite the entirely-positive role played by the United States vis-à-vis Jewish refugees before and after the war, and despite its key role in defeating Hitler.
60. For the development in the 1980s and 1990s of the deeply insulting, arrogant and utterly false theology of the overall responsibility of Gentile/Christian/Western culture for ‘the Holocaust’, that theology evincing a degree of gratuitous hostility that alone would justify the scrapping of the ‘Holocaust culture’ of North America and Europe.
61. For the stigmatization and even criminalization of questioning the conventional views of ‘The Holocaust’ promulgated by Jewish historians and organizations, and the resulting slide of free speech down the slippery slope toward eventual criminalization of public criticism of Israel one not-so-fine day. (Confident Holocaust traditionalists could have and should have invited critiques of even the most mean-spirited kind, given that their falsity would presumably be exposed as such in the light of uncontroversial evidence and established fact.)
62. For two-thirds of a century, Israel’s collaboration with Turkey in denying the official label of genocide to Turkey’s mass-murder of 1.5 million Armenians in the World War I era.
63. For the hate-crime of foisting upon later generations of Germans a continuation of the wartime guilt previously assigned to the 1930s/40s generation.
64. For the public funding of and school field trips to Holocaust Museum hate-centers that dispense hostility-fuelled ethnocentric propaganda that knowingly ignores active Jewish complicity in far-greater 20th-century crimes such as the Terror-Famine of 1932-33.
65. For inflicting upon tens of thousands of Palestinian males systematic torture (that most of us would rather die to avoid) for the kinds of acts of resistance that one would expect any self-respecting people to engage in given similar conditions of oppressive unending military occupation.
66. For the disgrace that one of the worst mass-murderers of the 20th century— — Lazar Kaganovich, a Jew and the USSR’s equivalent of Himmler — died peacefully in 1991 at age 98, without a peep ever heard from any Jewish group regarding any possible indictment for his prominent role in the Terror-Famine. Meanwhile every surviving non-Jew who assisted a concentration or death camp, simply to avoid death by starvation, is hounded to death by the Israeli ‘justice’ system, while their Jewish analogues are honored as noble Holocaust survivors.
67. For the failure of Jews anywhere to insist upon bringing to justice any of the Jewish leaders of a Cheka/GPU/NKVD that, in conjunction with Trotsky’s Red Army, was collectively-responsible for killing far more non-Jewish Soviet citizens 1917-1939 than Hitler’s Nazis killed Jews 1941-1945.
68. For the Soviets’ 70-year obliteration of Ukraine as a nation.
69. For the trillion-dollar looting of Russia in the 1990s mostly by a number of Russian Jews, for the subsequent economic collapse of Russia and for the rise of an extraordinarily-powerful oligarchy utterly-dominated by Jewish multi-billionaire KGBers-turned-gangster-businessmen, some with Russian/Israeli dual citizenship, ironically a complete turning-inside-out of the Russian ‘revolution’ of October 1917 that tossed out the Christian Orthodox Russian oligarchs. One could regard the whole 73-year Soviet interlude, in large part, as a series of massive transfers of wealth from Christian Russians to the Russian/Israeli/American Jewish communities.
70. For the October 1917-1990 crushing of the Russian soul, from which Russia has yet to recover. One key component of this was the near-extirpation of the Russian Orthodox Church by the atheistic Bolshevik regime during the 1930s, a regime which, curiously enough, donned kid gloves when giving the USSR’s synagogues a hard time.
71. For the spying on America by Soviet Jews and by their American Communist Party Jewish counterparts that evolved into spying on America by Israel, its lobby and its sayanim (the thousands of spy-assisting Jewish-American citizens prepared to betray American to Israeli interests).
72. For Jewish scholars’ wild exaggeration of the numbers of Jews killed in massacres by Bogdan Chmielnicki in Poland in the mid-1600s, and for their framing of Czarist régimes for supposedly having officially instigated the anti-Jewish pogroms of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Propagandists intent on tarring Gentile Ukrainians and the Czarist Russian élite to the utmost with charges of anti-Semitism have dined out endlessly on these debunked myths.
73. For the general pro-Israel skewing of American foreign policy given that the federal government and whatever administration is in power are typically permeated by Zionists, a replay of the pro-USSR skewing of FDR’s foreign policy due to the permeation of his administration by Communist spies, fellow travellers and sympathizers
74. For the anomalous shut-down of debate in Congress when it comes to Israel-related issues — now a longstanding anti-democratic tradition with sinister implications.
75. For the corruption of the fourth estate (the media) in the service of Jewish interests in general and Israeli interests in particular via overwhelmingly-Jewish ownership and managerial control. Jewish domination of the American mainstream media and ‘entertainment’ industries is blatant. In fact, Jewish dominance today extends over nearly the entire spectrum of American culture including Wall Street and especially the Federal Reserve Bank, far exceeding the spectacular extent of Jewish domination of Germany’s Weimar culture in the 1920s and early 1930s.
76. For the entirely-unnecessary stirring-up of anti-American hatred and terrorism in the Middle East.
77. Israel’s endless oppression of the Palestinians, providing motive enough for either bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to orchestrate the 9/11 attacks (if either or both indeed did so).
78. For the possible aiding and abetting of the 9/11 hijackers by Mossad, never properly investigated due to the placement of so many Zionist Jews in the higher reaches of the federal government including the departments of justice and homeland security.
79. In the wake of a basically Israel-caused 9/11, the diminishing or outright extirpation of many freedoms once taken for granted by Americans, and their replacement by police-state laws designed mainly to further the scourging of Israel’s rather than America’s enemies.
80. For the crushing to death of heroic American activist Rachel Corrie by an Israeli bulldozer in March 2003, and for the mostly-successful efforts of the Israel lobby to suppress a theatrical production about her life and her murder by the Israeli government.
81. For the likely Israeli murder of Nobel Peace Prize winner Yasser Arafat and its cover-up.
82. For all the U.S. government’s totally-squandered time and effort over the decades misdirected toward peace negotiations that Israel never had any intention of allowing to come to fruition, and for the consequent distraction from otherwise-resolvable problems elsewhere.
83. For 2003’s unprovoked unjustifiable downright-evil Jewish-neo-con-instigated attack by the U.S. and Britain on Iraq that left several thousand American and British soldiers dead, more than a million Iraqis dead including hundreds of thousands of children, and an American-supervised failed-state whose ‘creation’ will wind up costing the American public $2-3 trillion, all so as to eliminate Israel’s #2 enemy at the price of empowering its #1 enemy, Iran.
84. For the post-9/11 assassination of scores of Iranian scientists and engineers by Mossad, an echo of the NKVD dispatching tens of thousands of members of the Polish intelligentsia to their deaths.
85. For the infamous Israeli IOF massacre in 2010 of ten humanitarian-aid-activists aboard the Mavi Marmara, with dozens more wounded, despite the fact that the vessel was in international waters, had already aborted its Gaza-relief mission out of fear of an impending Israeli attack, and was heading away from Gaza.
86. For the corruption of the U.S. Congress on behalf of a hostile foreign power pretending to be an ally, by a lobby that is the most formidable component of a hostile elite, that is, an elite hostile to what was once dubbed America’s ‘silent majority’.
87. For the sabotage of the Arab Spring, especially in Egypt — now run by the army, which is an extension of the U.S. Army, which is itself an extension of a U.S. government that has made a tradition of deferring to Israel in nearly all Middle-Eastern matters.
88. For the continued immiserating of the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza, akin to and perhaps patterned on Hitler’s systematic ‘pressured emigration’ of Jews via the Nuremberg laws of 1935 and the increasingly-oppressive successors of those laws.
89. For Israel’s periodic ‘mowing the lawn’ invasions of Gaza that kill thousands including hundreds of children, maim even more thousands, and destroy infrastructure that cannot be replaced because of Israeli blockades of needed materials.
90. Even apart from Iraq, the West Bank and Gaza, we have seen the co-destruction by Israel and Western nations with strong Israel lobbies of several Middle-Eastern states including Lebanon (twice), Libya and Syria, the latter two cases constituting not just attempts to impose régime-change by force but the actual annihilation of their statehood altogether.
91. For the continued reflexive activation of the omnipresent potentially career-destroying bogeyman of anti-Semitism, hyper-charged by out-of-context self-exculpating Holocaust propaganda to assure otherwise-undeserved concessions and ‘kid-gloves’ treatment
92. For the serial and almost ritual humiliation of American presidents by Israel, such as George W’s by Sharon and Obama’s by Netanyahu.
93. For the transformation by Jewish (and business) interests of American immigration to ‘doors-wide-open’ replacement levels that will reduce Whites to a minority by mid-century, an induced majority-status suicide likely without precedent, but one openly applauded and cultivated by leading Jews everywhere, backed by their multicultural protégés and politically-correct White subalterns.
94. For the disastrous eight-year presidency of George W. Bush, made possible only by the prior Jewish defeat of efforts to eliminate the antiquated electoral-college system that Jews cherish because it gives them disproportionate if undemocratic electoral clout.
95. For the Jewish dominance in international publishing that orchestrated the vanishing of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s final book because the Nobel Prize-winning author of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and The Gulag Archipelago is less than flattering in his depiction of Russian Jews and their contribution to Communism in the pages of Two Hundred Years Together.
96. For the millions upon millions upon millions of internal and external Middle-Eastern refugees today, as a result of the Iraq war, instigated by Israel and its lobby, and as a result of the Syrian and Libyan civil wars, abetted by Israel and by its lobbies in meddling states such as the U.S., the U.K. and France, with the further result that hundreds of thousands of these refugees flee to Western Europe and North America, thereby accelerating Whites’ majority-status suicide.
97. For the extraordinary Middle-Eastern ravages of ISIS/ISIL/Daesh, a movement that arose almost inevitably from the ashes of an Iraq war instigated by Israel and its U.S. lobby, and for related domestic mass-murders in San Bernadino and Orlando.
98. For 80 years of propaganda disguising the reality of moral equivalence between the ‘Black Nazis’ and the ‘Red Nazis’.
99. For blaming everyone but itself for the tragedy that befell European Jewry mostly on account of Jewish actions, actions that also in fact generated disaster after disaster for the non-Jewish world, for none of which Jewish leaders would ever acknowledge even one iota of responsibility.
100. For Jewry’s flaunting itself as the moral paragon of its new supposedly-ecumenical ‘Holocaustianity’ religion in which we are all to enlist as honorary if subordinate members, this being in fact an essentially-immoral enterprise for 99.8 percent of humanity.
101. For the hundreds upon hundreds of Hollywood/network-television dramas and documentaries depicting Nazi concentration/death camps where Germans and East Europeans were the perpetrators vs the complete absence of Hollywood/network-television dramas and documentaries depicting the even more deadly Red Terror/Soviet Gulag/Terror Famine where Jews were highly-prominent amongst the perpetrators.
102. For falsifying the entire historical narrative of the 20th century, making ‘The Holocaust’ not only the centerpiece of World War II, but the pivot point around which all that came before or after must circle, surely the greatest feat of sheer propaganda ever foisted upon humanity.
103. For the relentless ratcheting back upward toward the six million mark of the estimated Jewish-Holocaust death toll by Holocaust ‘historians’. Everyone seems to have forgotten that ‘four-to-five’ million was the downwardly-revised most-common estimate in the decades immediately following the war. And Raul Hilberg, the so-called dean of Jewish Holocaust-historians, never changed his 5.1 million estimate over the course of his four decades of publishing on the subject. Nonetheless: the tantalizing six-million figure lures the estimates higher, and even when still several hundred thousand bodies short, ‘rounding’ up to six million is seen as legitimate despite the fact that Jews thereby ‘kill off’ far more of their own than did all the pogromists in all of pre-World-War II history. One is tempted to agree, though, that the six million figure is required to constitute a bona fide Holocaust, meaning that the enthusiastically very-much Jewish-assisted Terror Famine of 1932-33 with a death toll of 6.3 million was The Holocaust, and the Jewish Tragedy of 1941-45 with a death toll of 5-5.1 million was not.
104. For the following: As elaborated upon in a forthcoming article/chapter The Sixty-Million), had ‘ethnic justice’ somehow prevailed since 1917, meaning that had the various ethnic groups responsible for bringing about events resulting in huge death tolls been decimated in turn according to their degree of responsibility for those events, 36 million Jews would have perished, that number being double their pre-World-War II world population. Since Jews in fact lost only about 1/7th of the total that such ‘ethnic justice’ would have demanded, why then should the rest of the world mourn those losses at all? Rather mourn instead the vast numbers of dead amongst groups that bore little or no responsibility for bringing about the events mentioned above. Rather mourn instead our own loss of 400,000 American soldiers in World War II. Rather mourn instead of the Jewish ‘Holocaust’, the Ukrainians’ loss of more than 9 million souls 1932-1947, only a very small portion of whom could be construed as perpetrators of the horrendous events that befell either themselves or any other group.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

An Answer to the JQ by Grace Country Preacher

What about the Jews? Answer courtesy of the preacher:

grace country pastor

I’ll try to provide the scriptural explanation for the “Jewish problem”. Please pardon the length of this post but all scripture is needed to construct the argument.
Haxo and S// are not entirely wrong. They are mostly correct. Talmudic Jews, those who run Israel today are inherently satanic by nature. The Talmud is, very simply (Jewish) mans perversion of the Torah and other OT prophetic writings. Jesus Christ, the Jewish Messiah, in His earthly ministry came specifically to Israel to teach them their true nature and purpose, which was (and will someday be) to be the channel of blessing from God to the whole Gentile world. This is the reason God set up His own nation in the first place, beginning with Abraham; to reach the rest of the world with the knowledge of Himself.
Gen 12:1-3… “Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED.”
Zechariah 8:13… “And it shall come to pass, that as ye WERE a curse among the heathen, O house of Judah, and house of Israel; SO WILL I save you, and ye SHALL BE a blessing: fear not, but let your hands be strong.”
Christ came with two purposes, one prophesied since the world began (Acts 3:21) and one kept secret since the world began in order to once and for all defeat satan utterly (Rom 16:25). His earthly ministry (specifically) to the nation Israel was prophesied since the world began. This is the purpose which concerns this post. Christ Himself claims:
Mat 15:24… “But He answered and said, I am not sent BUT to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
Christ did not manifest Himself physically in the world for the Gentile nations. (That was Christ’s unprophesied, “secret” function via the Apostle Paul.)
John 1:11… “He came unto His own (Israel), and His own (Israel) received Him not.”
Currently, the Israel which now exists, counterfeit Israel, is a curse to all nations. They have blasphemed the name of the Creator God who formed them. Specifically, it is they who are eagerly awaiting the arrival of their own messiah, the anti-christ and will introduce him onto the world stage as “savior”. Speaking to the religious leaders of the country over 2,000 years ago Christ Himself said of them:
John 8:44… “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
Absolutely nothing has changed. God did however promise them control over the world; to be a blessing to it. In the ages to come they will rule the world in Godly wisdom from the “world capitol” Jerusalem.
Zechariah 8:22-23… “Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the Lord. Thus saith the Lord of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you.”
Mat 19:27-28… “Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”
The twelve tribes will then judge the Gentile nations with Christ on His rightful earthly throne.
Rev 21:10-12… “And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:”
Rev 19:15-16… “And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.”
The critical difference in understanding why Israel is the way it currently is, lies in the difference between the old and new covenants made specifically with the nation Israel. (Covenants are NOT made with Christians today. Christians today who believe they are under covenant agreements with God are in effect false Jews. God NEVER made a covenant with any nation or people BUT those of Israel.) The old covenant, the Law, God gave BECAUSE of Israel’s worldly transgressions.
Gal 3:19… “Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions (Israel’s near complete unbelief as God miraculously brought them out of Egyptian captivity), till the seed should come to whom the promise was made (promise made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob from whom came the twelve tribes); and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator (that mediator was Moses).”
They “covenanted” with God to keep it by their own efforts…
Deut 6:24-25… ” And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear the Lord our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day. And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as he hath commanded us.”
…but could not. No human can. It was meant to be that way. The perfect Law was established to prove to man that he was a hopeless sinner.
Rom 3:20… “Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.”
Jews today reject this utterly (as do many so called christians). If one is to keep the perfect Law, one must perfectly keep it.
Gal 3:10… “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them.”
Since failure to keep the Law resulted in many curses, Israel was punished severely throughout history (Leviticus 26:14-39). I highly encourage any “law keepers” out there to read the above curses which came upon the nation Israel for failure to keep it. Today’s “law keepers” can not claim the blessings and reject the curses… such is absolute hypocrisy.
Unbelieving Israel today is one very angry satanic nation. They intend to utterly destroy as much as possible before Christ returns in wrath to utterly destroy them. Those at the very top understand what is to come. None at the bottom do and for them I feel extremely sorry.
The new covenant will supernaturally put the Law into believing Israel’s hearts by way of Holy Ghost “possession” (if you will permit the term) and cause FUTURE “believing” Israel to be able to keep the Law perfectly as the few (the little flock of Luke 12:32) began to do in early Acts.
Ezekiel 36:23-28… “And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord, saith the Lord God, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes. For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land. (THIS HAS NOT YET HAPPENED. The Israel of 1948 is counterfeit anti-christ Israel because God did not miraculously cause it, men and therefore satan did.) Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. AND I WILL PUT MY SPIRIT WITHIN YOU, AND CAUSE YOU TO WALK IN MY STATUTES, AND YE SHALL KEEP MY JUDGEMENTS, AND DO THEM. And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.”
This is a future occurrence. It is clearly not happening today.
Heb 8:7-11… “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND THE HOUSE OF JUDAH: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL after those days, saith the Lord; I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR MINDS, AND WRITE THEM IN THEIR HEARTS: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.”
Currently, Israel is still unbelieving. They missed their true Messiah. They ARE of their father the devil as God Himself pointed out to them. (No wonder Jews hate Christ and the Apostles tried to show them the truth of their condition, so vehemently!) However, they are still operating under the currently (dispensationally) FALSE pretense that God has given them control over the world. As they tried (and failed; they don’t acknowledge this) to follow the Law by their own efforts, which would have been their righteousness; they also, by their own misguided efforts, are in fact trying to control the world. Doing such by their own efforts is in fact playing right into satans hands. God is not behind them, satan is. They are currently NOT Gods people.
Hosea 1:9… “Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God.”
Those who bless “Israel” today are in fact blessing the anti-christ world economic, political and religious “one-world” system. There are very few true Christians who understand what is going on here. Christian Zionism is one of, if not the most dangerous error in Christian theology today.
At some point, when this dispensation of grace is ended, God will once again (I personally believe in the same way as He saved Paul in Acts 9) save 144,000 Jews and send them into the world, speaking in tongues (all languages simultaneously) to once again preach that the Kingdom is at hand. As in early Acts they will once again be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, cast out devils, drink deadly things, etc… as the anti-christ will be walking physically among the world trying to wipe them out. It is at this time that the Gentile nations will once again be required to bless Israel as they will desperately need such blessing as food and shelter, clothes and money.
Notice very carefully that the nations (sheep and or goats) do not know how or why they are entering into (or not) Gods Kingdom come…
Mat 25:31-46… “When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, WHEN saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? WHEN saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? OR WHEN saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye HAVE done it unto one of the least of these my brethren (the 144,000), ye have done it unto me. Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, WHEN saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it NOT to one of the least of these (THE 144,000), ye did it NOT to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.”
This is Genesis 12:1-3 come to full fruition in the world. “I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee.”
Amazing how much sense the Bible makes when its overall construction is understood. It is a book of progressive revelation with Paul as the final human that God revealed His ultimate plans to.
The Kingdom has not been “at hand” for some 2,000 years. Grace is currently at hand where God does NOT recognize Jew or Gentile (Gal 3:28). All men have been judged guilty and condemned equally (Rom 3:23). Faith and trust in the atoning death, burial and resurrection of Christ alone is the payment for that guilty verdict (Eph 1:13, 1 Cor 15:1-4). When one does not understand the Bible dispensationally, that is, “unchanging” God dealing with “changing” mankind in different ways during different time periods (dispensations), one has only a partial clue as to what is actually happening in the world around them and no comprehension of WHY. To understand the world fully one must understand the King James Bible dispensationally.
The Muslims are a very useful tool in Israels toolbox. So too are most “Christians” who support them blindly because that’s what anti-christ religion expects of them.
grace and peace… (while it’s still available)